Russian Journal of Earth Sciences Russian Journal of Earth Sciences Russian Journal of Earth Sciences 1681-1208 46990 ОРИГИНАЛЬНЫЕ СТАТЬИ ORIGINAL ARTICLES ОРИГИНАЛЬНЫЕ СТАТЬИ Magnetolithologic and Magnetomineralogical Characteristics of Deposits at the Mesozoic/Cenozoic Boundary: Gams Section Austria Magnetolithologic and Magnetomineralogical Characteristics of Deposits at the Mesozoic/Cenozoic Boundary: Gams Section Austria Pechersky D M Pechersky D M Grachev A F Grachev A F Nourgaliev D K Nourgaliev D K Tsel'movich V A Tsel'movich V A Sharonova Z V Sharonova Z V Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia ru Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia ru Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia ru Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia ru Kazan State University, Kazan, Russia ru Kazan State University, Kazan, Russia ru Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia ru Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia ru Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia ru Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia ru 8 3 1 23 10 11 2021 https://rjes.ru/en/nauka/article/46990/view

This paper continues a series of detailed magnetolithologic and magnetomineralogical investigations of epicontinental deposits at the Mesozoic/Cenozoic K/T boundary and is devoted to the study of a small segment of the Gams section Austria including the K/T. Thermomagnetic analysis revealed several magnetic phases; according to the curve MT, these are goethite nbsp;T C = 90-150o C, hemoilmenite nbsp;T C = 200-300o C, metallic nickel nbsp;T C = 350-360o C, magnetite and titanomagnetite nbsp;T C = 550-610o C, a Fe-Ni alloy nbsp;T C = 640-660o C, and metallic iron nbsp;T C = 740-770o C. Ensembles of magnetic grains has similar coercivity spectra in all samples and are characterized by a high coercivity. Against this background, the transition layer J with a maximum at 25-40nbsp;mT is identified, which is related to grains of metallic nickel and the Fe-Ni alloy. Numerous small single-domain and superparamagnetic grains of magnetic minerals present throughout the rock sequence contribute appreciably to the magnetic susceptibility of the rocks. With rare exceptions, the study deposits are anisotropic and have a mostly oblate magnetic fabric foliation, indicating a terrigenous origin of the magnetic minerals. Many samples of sandy-clayey sediments have inverse magnetic fabric. This is primarily related to the inverse magnetic fabric of needle goethite that is present among the iron hydroxides. Relative contributions of paramagnetic iron hydroxides, clays, and so on and diamagnetic carbonates and quartz components in the sediments are estimated from M s values near 800o C, where the contribution of magnetic minerals is absent. Results of these studies imply that the K/T boundary is distinguished by a sharp rise in the concentrations of iron hydroxides and paramagnetic Fe-bearing minerals it is at the K/T boundary, in the transition layer J, a sharp rise in the concentrations of magnetite and hemoilmenite occurs 4nbsp;cm above the K/T boundary. Lithologic control has no influence on the concentration of titanomagnetite, thereby reflecting the titanomagnetite dispersal at the time of eruptive activity that was most pronounced in the Maestrichtian. Metallic iron is distributed along the section rather uniformly, implying that it is most likely meteoritic dust. The occurrence of metallic nickel in the deposits is a unique phenomenon.

This paper continues a series of detailed magnetolithologic and magnetomineralogical investigations of epicontinental deposits at the Mesozoic/Cenozoic K/T boundary and is devoted to the study of a small segment of the Gams section Austria including the K/T. Thermomagnetic analysis revealed several magnetic phases; according to the curve MT, these are goethite nbsp;T C = 90-150o C, hemoilmenite nbsp;T C = 200-300o C, metallic nickel nbsp;T C = 350-360o C, magnetite and titanomagnetite nbsp;T C = 550-610o C, a Fe-Ni alloy nbsp;T C = 640-660o C, and metallic iron nbsp;T C = 740-770o C. Ensembles of magnetic grains has similar coercivity spectra in all samples and are characterized by a high coercivity. Against this background, the transition layer J with a maximum at 25-40nbsp;mT is identified, which is related to grains of metallic nickel and the Fe-Ni alloy. Numerous small single-domain and superparamagnetic grains of magnetic minerals present throughout the rock sequence contribute appreciably to the magnetic susceptibility of the rocks. With rare exceptions, the study deposits are anisotropic and have a mostly oblate magnetic fabric foliation, indicating a terrigenous origin of the magnetic minerals. Many samples of sandy-clayey sediments have inverse magnetic fabric. This is primarily related to the inverse magnetic fabric of needle goethite that is present among the iron hydroxides. Relative contributions of paramagnetic iron hydroxides, clays, and so on and diamagnetic carbonates and quartz components in the sediments are estimated from M s values near 800o C, where the contribution of magnetic minerals is absent. Results of these studies imply that the K/T boundary is distinguished by a sharp rise in the concentrations of iron hydroxides and paramagnetic Fe-bearing minerals it is at the K/T boundary, in the transition layer J, a sharp rise in the concentrations of magnetite and hemoilmenite occurs 4nbsp;cm above the K/T boundary. Lithologic control has no influence on the concentration of titanomagnetite, thereby reflecting the titanomagnetite dispersal at the time of eruptive activity that was most pronounced in the Maestrichtian. Metallic iron is distributed along the section rather uniformly, implying that it is most likely meteoritic dust. The occurrence of metallic nickel in the deposits is a unique phenomenon.

 Mesozoic/Cenozoic K/T boundary magnetomineralogy lithology magnetic minerals petromagnetology. Mesozoic/Cenozoic K/T boundary magnetomineralogy lithology magnetic minerals petromagnetology.

Adamia, Geologica Carpatica, v. 23, no. 3, 1993. Adamia, Geologica Carpatica, v. 23, no. 3, 1993. Alvarez, Science, v. 250, 1990. Alvarez, Science, v. 250, 1990. Bagin, Magnetism of #x3B1;-Oxides and Hydroxides of Iron, 1988. Bagin, Magnetism of #x3B1;-Oxides and Hydroxides of Iron, 1988. Bagin, Izv. Acad. Sci. USSR Phys. Solid Earth, v. 12, no. 9, 1976. Bagin, Izv. Acad. Sci. USSR Phys. Solid Earth, v. 12, no. 9, 1976. Bagin, Izv. Acad. Sci. USSR Phys. Solid Earth, v. 13, no. 2, 1977. Bagin, Izv. Acad. Sci. USSR Phys. Solid Earth, v. 13, no. 2, 1977. Baulus, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., v. 182, 2000., doi: 10.1016/S0012-821X0000245-4 Baulus, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., v. 182, 2000., doi: 10.1016/S0012-821X0000245-4 Burov, Paleomagnetic Analysis, 1986. Burov, Paleomagnetic Analysis, 1986. Day, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., v. 13, 1977., doi: 10.1016/0031-92017790108-X Day, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., v. 13, 1977., doi: 10.1016/0031-92017790108-X Dunlop, J. Geophys. Res., v. 107, no. B3, 2002., doi: 10.1029/2001JB000486 Dunlop, J. Geophys. Res., v. 107, no. B3, 2002., doi: 10.1029/2001JB000486 Dunlop, J. Geophys. Res., v. 107, no. B3, 2002., doi: 10.1029/2001JB000487 Dunlop, J. Geophys. Res., v. 107, no. B3, 2002., doi: 10.1029/2001JB000487 Egli, J. Geophys. Res., v. 108, no. B2, 2003., doi: 10.1029/2002JB002023 Egli, J. Geophys. Res., v. 108, no. B2, 2003., doi: 10.1029/2002JB002023 Ellwood, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., v. 206, 2003., doi: 10.1016/S0012-821X0201124-X Ellwood, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., v. 206, 2003., doi: 10.1016/S0012-821X0201124-X Ernst, Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., v. 31, 2003., doi: 10.1146/annurev.earth.31.100901.145500 Ernst, Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., v. 31, 2003., doi: 10.1146/annurev.earth.31.100901.145500 Gapeev, Izv. Acad. Sci. USSR Phys. Solid Earth, v. 24, no. 10, 1988. Gapeev, Izv. Acad. Sci. USSR Phys. Solid Earth, v. 24, no. 10, 1988. Grachev, Izv. Phys. Solid Earth, v. 36, 2000. Grachev, Izv. Phys. Solid Earth, v. 36, 2000. Grachev, Russian J. Earth Sci., v. 7, 2005., doi: 10.2205/2005ES000189 Grachev, Russian J. Earth Sci., v. 7, 2005., doi: 10.2205/2005ES000189 Lahodynsky, Riv. Espanola de Paleontologia, no. extraordinario, 1988. Lahodynsky, Riv. Espanola de Paleontologia, no. extraordinario, 1988. Montanari, Planet. Space Sci., v. 46, 1998., doi: 10.1016/S0032-06339700130-X Montanari, Planet. Space Sci., v. 46, 1998., doi: 10.1016/S0032-06339700130-X Morner, 27 IGC Session, Abstracts, vol. 9, 1984. Morner, 27 IGC Session, Abstracts, vol. 9, 1984. Nagata, Rock-Magnetism, 1961. Nagata, Rock-Magnetism, 1961. Nazarov, Byull. MOIP, Otd. Geol., v. 68, no. 3, 1993. Nazarov, Byull. MOIP, Otd. Geol., v. 68, no. 3, 1993. Pechersky, Russian J. Earth Sci., v. 7, no. 2, 2005. Pechersky, Russian J. Earth Sci., v. 7, no. 2, 2005. Pechersky, Izv. Phys. Solid Earth, v. 42, no. 10, 2006. Pechersky, Izv. Phys. Solid Earth, v. 42, no. 10, 2006. Richter, Phys. Earth Planet. Int., v. 82, 1994. Richter, Phys. Earth Planet. Int., v. 82, 1994. Robertson, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., v. 82, 1994., doi: 10.1016/0031-92019490074-4 Robertson, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., v. 82, 1994., doi: 10.1016/0031-92019490074-4 Rocchia, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., v. 99, 1990., doi: 10.1016/0012-821X9090111-A Rocchia, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., v. 99, 1990., doi: 10.1016/0012-821X9090111-A Rochette, Rev. Geophys., v. 30, 1992. Rochette, Rev. Geophys., v. 30, 1992. Sholpo, Rock Magnetism Applications to Geological Problems, 1977. Sholpo, Rock Magnetism Applications to Geological Problems, 1977. Veimarn, Global Catastrophic Events and Their Implications for Stratigraphic Correlations of Sedimentary Basins of Various Types, 1998. Veimarn, Global Catastrophic Events and Their Implications for Stratigraphic Correlations of Sedimentary Basins of Various Types, 1998. Yasonov, Geologica Carpathica, v. 49, no. 3, 1998. Yasonov, Geologica Carpathica, v. 49, no. 3, 1998.