REGISTRATION AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS OF WAVEFORMS OF 10.24.2019 EARTHQUAKE IN THE CAUCASUS USING THE NEW IGES-006 SEISMIC SENSOR
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
The paper considers the application possibility of the new IGES-006 seismic sensor for monitoring tasks. The sensor is developed at the Institute of Geophysics and Engineering Seismology after A. Nazarov of the National Academy of Sciences of Armenia. The IGES-006 sensor can be used both as part of various seismic monitoring systems and for solving special engineering problems. The sensor prototype has successfully passed laboratory and field tests, including the seismic monitoring mode. To assess the possibility of using the IGES-006 sensor as an import-substituting scientific device, it was compared with the Russian SPV-3K sensor, which is quite similar in parameters. A comparative analysis of seismic signals recorded using IGES-006 and SPV-3K sensors in the time and frequency domains have been carried out. The comparison results indicate the prospects for mass production of IGES-006.

Keywords:
earthquake, seismic signal, portable seismic sensor, seismic sensor, spectral analysis
References

1. Dzeboev, B. A., A. A. Soloviev, B. V. Dzeranov, et al. (2019) , Strong earthquake-prone areas recognition based on the algorithm with a single pure training class. II. Caucasus, M≥ 6.0. Variable EPA method, Russ. J. Earth. Sci., 19, p. ES6005, https://doi.org/10.2205/2019ES000691

2. Grigoryan, V. G., J. K. Karapetyan (2008) , Complex analysis of quantitative parameters of soil vibrations and assessment of their dependencies on earthquake magnitudes, Structural Mechanics and Analysis, no. 3, p. 59-63 (in Russian)

3. Ismail-Zadeh, A., S. Adamia, A. Chabukiani, et al. (2020) , Geodynamics, seismicity and seismic hazards of the Caucasus, Earth Sci. Rev., 207, p. 103222, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103222

4. Karapetyan, J. K. (2013) , Comparative analysis of dynamic coefficient β(T,n) curves obtained by different methods, Seism. Instr., 49, p. 307-314, https://doi.org/10.3103/S0747923913040038

5. Karapetyan, J. K. (2017) , Seismic safety and approaches for its implementation, Geoinformatics Research Papers, 5, p. 102 of 172, https://doi.org/10.2205/CODATA2017

6. Karapetyan, J. K. (2018a) , Seismic safety instrumental monitoring system, edited by Sebastiano D'Amico, Pauline Galea, George Bozionelos, Emanuele Colica, Daniela Farrugia and Matthew R. Agius (Eds.), Book of Abstracts of the 36-th General Assembly of the European Seismological Commission, Univeristy of Malta, 2-7 Sep 2018, Valletta, Malta (ESC2018-S2-926)

7. Karapetyan, J. K. (2018b) , Seismic sensors for global seismic monitoring and earthquake research in Armenia, AGU100, American Geophysical Union, 10-14 Dec 2018, Washington D.C (S13C-0459)

8. Karapetyan, J. K. (2018c) , Study of seismicity and seismological investigations on the territory of Armenia, International Conference for the Decade Memory of the Wenchuan Earthquake with The 4-th International Conference on Continental Earthquakes (The 4-th, ICCE, May 12-14, 2018, Chengdu, Sichuan, China

9. Karapetyan, J. K., A. Gasparyan (2018) , A new-type seismometer, 30 Years after the Spitak earthquake: experience and perspectives, AGU100, National Academy of Sciences of Armenia, 3-7 Dec 2018, Yerevan, Armenia (67-68)

10. Karapetyan, J. K., R. K. Karapetyan (2019) , New Type of Sensor to Record Motion, AGU100, American Geophysical Union, 9-13 Dec 2019, San Francisco CA (S41G-0604)

11. Karapetyan, J. K., R. S. Sargsyan, K. S. Ghazaryan, et al. (2020) , Current state of study and actual problems of tectonics, seismology and seismotectonics of the territory of Armenia, Russ. J. Earth. Sci., 20, p. ES2005, https://doi.org/10.2205/2020ES000709

12. Mackey, K., D. Burk, K. Chalyy (2013) , Preliminary work on new method for full station calibration of equipped skm and SM-3 seismometers, The proceedings of scientific works of the conference is dedicated to the 70-th Anniversary of National Academy of sciences, National Academy of Sciences of Armenia, 3-5 May 2013, Yerevan, Armenia (73-77)

13. Rykov, A. V. (1992) , Seismometer, and oscillations of the Earth, Izvestiya AN SSSR. Fizika Zemli, no. 2, p. 76-80 (in Russian)

14. Rykov, A. V. (1992) , The theory and practice of seismometry in Russia (to B.B. Galitzin's 140-th anniversary, Izvestiya AN SSSR. Fizika Zemli, 37, p. 24-37 (in Russian)

15. Sarkgsyan, V. K. (2010) , Wide-band three-component seismometer with digital output, Izv. NAN. Ser. tekhn. nauk, 63, no. 3, p. 313-318 (in Russian)

16. Sarkgsyan, R. E. (2014) , Modernization of the SM-3 seismometer, Seism. Instr., 50, p. 244-245, https://doi.org/10.3103/S0747923914030086

17. Savarensky, E. F., D. P. Kirnos (2019) , , Elements of seismology and seismometry, p. 384 p., Tehizdat, Moscow (in Russian)

18. Sidorin, A. Ya. (2018) , In memory of A.V. Rykov, Seism. Instr., 54, no. 4, p. 77-80

19. Tokmakov, V. A. (1975) , Seismometer SM-3, Seism. Instr., 8, p. 14-18 (In Russian)

20. Vasil'ev, I. M., Yu. P. Kozhevnikov, I. V. Matveev, at al. (2016) , Seismometers for monitoring systems, Science and Technological Developments, 95, no. 4, p. 5-10, https://doi.org/10.21455/std2016.4-1

Login or Create
* Forgot password?