The mathematical approximation of the relation for the distances of planets from the Sun and distribution of the planet masses in the Solar system are represented. It is shown that the planetary distances from the Sun can be accurately described by the logarithmic spiral equation. The same relation is established for the four biggest satellites of the Jupiter. The relationship between the masses of the terrestrial planets and their distance from the Sun. is described by the parabola equation. This relationship for the outer planets of the Solar system is described by hyperbola equation. These data allow us to conclude, that the big gaseous planets were formed on the terrestrial planets position on the beginning stage. The gaseous components of these planets were redistributed between the Sun and the Jupiter on the next stage and the terrestrial planets were formed from residual material. There are three hypotheses, which can be used for the new models of formation of the planetary systems. Hypothesis 1. Besides molecular clouds there is another source of material, from which stars and planet systems forms. Hypothesis 2. Protosolar cloud can have form high temperature plasma jet. Hypothesis 3. The jet of plasma can roll up in the spiral whirl in which a material moves towards the pole of the spiral where the central star forms.
Planetary system, terrestrial planets, distances of the planet from the Sun, distribution of mass in the Solar system, planet formation
1. Alexander, R. D., Armitage, P. J. Giant planet migration, disk evolution and the origin of terrestrial disks, // Astrophys. J., 2009. - v. 704 - p. 989.
2. Anfilogov, V. N., Khachay, Y. V. Some Aspects of the Formation of the Solar System - Springer Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London: Springer Briefs in Earth Sciences., 2015. - 75 pp.
3. Buruteau, C., Lin, D. N. C. Protoplanetary migration in turbulent isothermal disk, // Astrophys. J., 2010. - v. 709 - p. 759.
4. Grady, C. A., Muto, T., Hashimoto, J. Spiral arms in the asymmetrically illuminated disk on MWC 758 and constraints on giant planets, // Astrophys. J., 2013. - v. 762 - p. 48.
5. Hasegawa, Y., Ida, S. Do giant planets survivetype II migration, // Astrophys. J., 2013. - v. 774 - p. 146.
6. Matsushita, S., Ida, S., Nagasawa, M. Effect of dinamical evolution of giant planets of survival of terrestrial planets, // Astrophys. J., 2013. - v. 767 - p. 129.
7. Moriarty, J., Madhusudhan, N., Fischer, D. Chemistry in an evolution protoplanetary disk effect on terrestrial planet composition, // Astrophys. J., 2014. - v. 787 - p. 81.
8. Nagasava, M., Thommes, E. W., Kenyjn, S. J. The diverse origin of terrestrial planet systems // Protostars and Planets, V. B. Reipurth, G. Jewitt and K. Keil (Eds.) - Tucson, AZ: Univ. of Arizona Press., 2006. - p. 639.
9. Ouellette, N., Desh, S. N., Hester, J. J. Injection of Supernova dust in nearby protoplanetary disk, // Astrophys. J., 2010. - v. 711 - p. 597.
10. Paardekooper, S.-J., Geoffroy, L., Papalozou, J. S. B. Vortex migration in protoplanetary disks, // Astrophys. J., 2010. - v. 725 - p. 146.
11. Papaloizou, J. C. B., et al. Disk-planet interaction during planet formation // Protostars and Planets, V. B. Reipurth, G. Jewitt and K. Keil (Eds.) - Tucson, AZ: Univ. of Arizona Press., 2006. - p. 655.
12. Vitjazev, A., Pechernikova, G., Safronov, V. The Earth's Group of Planets - Moscow: Nauka., 1990. - 296 pp.
13. Voitkevich, G., et al. Handbook on Geochemistry - Moscow: Nedra., 1977. - 184 pp.
14. Zarkov, V., Trubitsin, V. Physics of the Earth and Planets - Moscow: Nauka., 1980. - 416 pp.
15. Wadhawa, M., Amelin, Y., Davis, A. M. From dust to planetesimales: Implication for the Solar protoplanetary disk from short-lived radionuclides // Protostars and Planets, V. B. Reipurth, G. Jewitt and K. Keil (Eds.) - Tucson, AZ: Univ. of Arizona Press., 2006. - p. 835.
