The specific distribution of Fe3O4 nanoparticles synthesized in situ in a polymeric PVA matrix was studied using the methods of magnetic measurements, transmission and depth-selective Mouml;ssbauer spectroscopy, and tunnel microscopy. The magnetic nanoparticles volumetric concentration Cv varied in the study samples from 0.6nbsp;vol.nbsp;% to 43nbsp;vol.nbsp;%. The size of the nanoparticles, measured using the X-ray diffraction, was found to be 10-20nbsp;nm. In the case of low Cv values the nanoparticles showed the composition of maghemite. At growing Cv concentrations, the product of the synthesis was partially oxidized magnetite. The contribution of the particles participating in the magnetic interaction at room temperature was estimated from the hyperfine magnetic splitting of the Mouml;ssbauer spectra. The blocking temperatures of the films of all compositions were found to be in the region of 300o C. This study revealed the high planar and linear magnetic anisotropy of the remanent saturation magnetization and of the remanent laboratory synthesis magnetization LSM. The Mouml;ssbauer and microscopic studies revealed that during the synthesis the particles are distributed in the nanocomposite irregularly over the matrix, remaining almost isolated at the surface of the films and producing, in the lower part of the film, the chains of interacting nanoparticles, extending parallel to the film plain along the resulting trend. This chain structure is treated here as an artificial analog of fossil bacterial structures and biofilms, contributing to the magnetization of sedimentary rocks.
magnetic nanoparticles, thin films, magnetic properties, magnetic anisotropy.
1. Araki, The Rigaku J., v. 6, no. 2, 1989.
2. Berkowitz, J. Appl. Phys., v. 39, 1968.
3. Coey, Phys. Status Solidi A., v. 11, 1972.
4. DeLong, Science, v. 259, 1993.
5. Dunlop, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., v. 26, 1981.
6. Evans, Environmental Magnetism, Principles and Applications, 2003.
7. Fassbinder, Nature, v. 343, 1990.
8. Fredrickson, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, v. 62, no. 19/20, 1998.
9. Gendler, Paleomagnetism and Rock Magnetism: Theory, Experiments, and Application, 2004.
10. Gendler, Geophys. J. Int., v. 160, 2005.
11. Gibbs-Eggar, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., v. 168, no. 1--2, 1999.
12. Goss, Phys. Chem. Miner., v. 16, 1988.
13. Han, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., v. 136, 1994.
14. Hancock, Nature Genetics, v. 29, 2001.
15. Haneda, Solid State Commun., v. 22, 1977.
16. Jakson, The IRM Quarterly, v. 14, no. 1, 2004.
17. Jianbao, J. Appl. Phys., v. 87, no. 10, 2000.
18. Jolivet, Clays Clay Miner., v. 40, no. 5, 1992.
19. Krumbein, Fossil and Recent Biofilms, 2003.
20. Kuprin, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B, v. 62, 1992.
21. Morrish, J. Appl. Phys., v. 26, 1955.
22. M\orup, Hyperfine Interact., v. 60, 1990.
23. Moskowitz, Geophys. Res. Lett., v. 16, 1989.
24. Novakova, Hyperfine Interact., v. 71, 1992.
25. Novakova, Magnetic properties of polymer nanocomposites containing iron oxide nanoparticles, 2002.
26. Novakova, J. Magn Magn. Mater, v. 258--259, 2003.
27. Novakova, American Inst. of Physics AIP Conference Proceeding, v. 765, 2005.
28. Novakova, Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Fiz., v. 69, no. 4, 2005.
29. Pankhurst, Hyperfine Interact., v. 90, 1994.
30. Peck, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., v. 140, 1996.
31. Rudee, Microscopy and Microanalysis, v. 3, no. 2, 1997.
32. Sato, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., v. 65, 1987.
33. Shcherbakov, Eur. Biophys. J., v. 26, 1997.
34. Sohn, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., v. 182, 1998.
35. Tarduno, Geophys. Res. Lett., v. 25, no. 21, 1998.
36. Voogt, Phys. Rev. B, v. 57, no. 14, 1998.
37. Zheng, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., v. 18, 1998.
