PRINCIPAL FEATURES MASTER CURVE OF GEOMAGNETIC FIELD VARIATIONS IN BELORUSSIA DURING THE LAST 12 THOUSAND YEARS
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
This paper presents the results of the paleomagnetic studies of the Naroch and Svir lake bottom deposits in Belorussia. The objects of study were nine columns of lake-floor sediments, totaling 6.50nbsp;m in thickness, collected using a special-type core sampler which did not disturb the structure of the sample material. The absolute dating of the sediments was performed by a radiocarbon method using the macroremains of the organic matter grass. The columns of the sediments were correlated using their absolute ages, lithologies, and magnetic susceptibility values. All sedimentary rock columns showed a good agreement of the inclination and declination components of the natural remanent magnetization ChRM distinguished in all sedimentary rock columns using alternative magnetic field cleaning. The data obtained for all rock columns were summed up to produce the composite curves of ChRM declination and inclination variation for the sediments of these lakes. These data were compared with the archeomagnetic and limnomagnetic data available for Central and East Europe. All records of the paleosecular geomagnetic variations PSV showed a good agreement in terms of the morphology of the ChRM declination and inclination. At the same time the sediments of the Belorussian lakes showed a systematically older age and the lower magnitudes of the ChRM declination and inclination variations compared to the other PSV records available. These effects can be explained by the presence of some postdeposition remanent magnetization PDRM in the sediments of the Belorussian lakes and by the addition of some "aged'' carbon without 14C to the lake from the surrounding carbonate rocks. The basic features of the geomagnetic field variations in Europe are discussed for the last 10-12 thousand years.

Keywords:
paleomagnetism, modern lake deposits, Naroch and Svir lakes, Holocene, paleosecular geomagnetic variations, radiocarbon dating .
Text
Publication text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Borisov, Monitoring of the Geological Environment: Active Endogenic and Exogenic Processes, 2000.

2. Borisov, The Processes of Postsedimentation Magnetization and Characteristic Changes in the Magnetic Field and Climate of the Earth in the Past, 2003.

3. Bleil, Use of Proxies in Paleooceanography: Examples from the South Atlantic, 1999.

4. Bloxham, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser., v. A92, 1989., doi:https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1989.0087

5. Bronk, Radiocarbon, v. 37, no. 2, 1995.

6. Burov, Paleomagnetic Analysis, 1986.

7. Constable, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, v. A358, 2000., doi:https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2000.0570

8. Creer, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., v. 66, 1981.

9. Daly, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., v. 93, 1996., doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-92019503075-1

10. Deevey, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., v. 40, 1954., doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.40.5.285

11. Frank, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., v. 133, 2002., doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-92010200085-7

12. Franke, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., v. 147, no. 2-3, 2004., doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2004.07.004

13. Hongre, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., v. 106, 1998., doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-92019700115-5

14. Jackson, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, v. 358, 2000., doi:https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2000.0569

15. Korte, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., v. 140, no. 1-3, 2003., doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2003.07.013

16. Lund, Geophys. Res. Lett., v. 12, 1985., doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/GL012i005p00251

17. Lund, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., v. 122, 1994., doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X9490005-1

18. Mackereth, Limnol. Oceanography, v. 3, 1958., doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X7190219-6

19. Mackereth, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., v. 12, 1971.

20. Nourgaliev, Physics of the Solid Earth, v. 39, no. 3, 2003.

21. Ojala, The Holocene, v. 12, no. 4, 2002., doi:https://doi.org/10.1191/0959683602hl551rp

22. Snowball, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., v. 68, 1991., doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-92019190004-2

23. Snowball, The Holocene, v. 12, no. 5, 2002., doi:https://doi.org/10.1191/0959683602hl562rp

24. Stiller, Radiocarbon, v. 43, no. 2B, 2001.

25. Stockhausen, Geophys. J. Int., v. 135, 1998., doi:https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246X.1998.00664.x

26. Tarasov, Lake Status records from the FSU/Database Documentation Version 2, 1996.

27. Turner, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., v. 70, 1982.

28. Verozub, Rev. Geophys. Space Phys., v. 15, 1977., doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/RG015i002p00129

29. Yakushko, Belorussian Lakes: Geologic History and Modern State of Lakes in Northern Belorussia, 1971.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?