BISAC SCI019000 Earth Sciences / General
The article deals with the creation of an information and analytical platform for assessing external causes of technogenic (man-made) accidents and for improving methods of their predication and prevention on the territories of long-term geological, mining, and engineering activities on the Southeastern (SE) Transbaikal region example – one of the key areas for mining and extraction of the strategic raw minerals in Russia. 3D modeling of active geological structures and hazardous seismogeodynamic processes on GIS-based technologies is a key instrument for forecasting dangerous natural and technogenic events and risk reduction of their occurrence. A matter of minimizing consequences of natural and technogenic disasters for such facilities of increased technological and environmental hazards as minefields, radiochemical facilities, sites for spent nuclear material disposal, dams, gas and oil pipelines, etc. has become essential. It is necessary to assess modern geodynamic territory’s activity on a unified geoinformation platform applying the newest integrated geological-geophysical researches’ methods for these objects, to select seismically active fault-fracture zones, to determine the rate and direction of surface displacement, to establish patterns of subsoil stressed-strained state natural component influence on behavior of local technogenic processes. Taking into account the specificities of geotectonic structure of mining territories, the structure of monitoring seismogeodynamic processes network on multifunctional geodynamic test sites should be developed. Observations made on test sites form the information basis for forecasting of lithosphere condition, taking decisions on rational subsurface management and providing ecological safety of the territory.
active geological structures, hazardous seismic and tectonic processes, stressed-strained state of rocks, database, geoinformation system, three-dimensional modeling, deposits of strategic mineral resources, monitoring of natural and technogenic phenomena, southeastern Transbaikal
1. Adushkin, V. V., and S. B. Turuntaev, Technogenic processes in the Earth’s crust, 252 pp., Moscow: INAK, (in Russian), 2005.
2. Ahern, D. F., and N. P. Laverov (Eds.), Internationalization of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, doihttps://doi.org/10.17226/12477, 2009.
3. Andreeva, O. V., V. A. Petrov, and V. V. Poluektov, Mesozoic Acid Magmatites of Southeastern Transbaikalia: Petrogeochemistry and Relationship with Metasomatism and Ore Formation, Geology of Ore Deposits, 62(1),69-96, doihttps://doi.org/10.1134/s1075701520010018, 2020.
4. BGI, International Gravimetric Bureau, http://www.bgi.obsmip.fr/, accessed: 20210607, 2021.
5. Bortnikov, N. S. (Ed.), Fundamental basis of formation of a resource base of strategic raw materials (Au, Ag, Pt, Cu, rare elements and metals), 340 pp., Geos, Moscow., (in Russian), 2012.
6. Bortnikov, N. S., and V. A. Petrov (Eds.), Strategic and high tech metal deposits of the Russian Federation: patterns of placement, conditions of formation, innovative technologies for forecasting and development (Program’s results N1. 48 Presidium RAS), 317 pp., (in Russian), 2020.
7. Bortnikov, N. S., V. A. Petrov, A. V. Veselovskiy, et al.,Geoinformation system (gis) of transbaikal sector of Mongolian-okhotsk mobile belt, Ores and Metals, (3),18-27, (in Russian), 2012.
8. Bugaev, E. V., I. V. Kaliberda, I. M. Lavrov, and L. M. Fihieva, Problems of regulatory support for the safe location of nuclear facilities, Nuclear and Radiation Safety,2, 114-121, 2005.
9. Catalogue, Catalogue of rock bursts at ore and nonmetallic deposits (Severouralsk, Tashtagol, October, Norilsk, Yukspor, Kukisvumchorskoye (PO ”Apatite“), Kochkarskoye and other deposits, (in Russian), 1989.
10. Delvaux, D., R. Moeys, G. Stapel, A. Melnikov, and V. Ermikov, Palaeostress reconstructions and geodynamics of the Baikal region, Central Asia, Part 2. Palaeozoicand Mesozoic prerift evolution, Tectonophysics, 252(14), 61-101, doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/00401951(95)000909, 1995.
11. Delvaux, D., R. Moeys, G. Stapel, C. Petit, K. Levi,A. Miroshnichenko, V. Ruzhich, and V. San’kov, Paleostress reconstructions and geodynamics of the Baikal region, Central Asia, Part 2.Cenozoic rifting, Tectonophysics, 282(1), 1-38,doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S00401951(97)002102,structural Controls on Sedimentary Basin Formation,1997.
12. Dmitriev, P. N., New methods of processing and interpretation of radar satellite interferometry data: dissertation for the degree of candidate of physical and mathematical sciences, 124 pp., IFZ RAS, Moscow, (in Russian), 2013.
13. Ferretti, A., C. Prati, and F. Rocca, Nonlinear subsidence rate estimation using permanent scatterers in differential sar interferometry, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 38(5), 2202-2212,doihttps://doi.org/10.1109/36.868878, 2000.
14. Geotechnologien, Geoscientific Research and Development Programme, http://www.geotechnologien.de/,accessed: 20210610, 2021.
15. Gliko, A. O. (Ed.), Extremal natural events and disasters. Vol. 2: Uranium geology, geoecology, glaciology, 431 pp., IFZ RAS, Moscow, (in Russian), 2011.
16. Gorshkov, A. I., and A. A. Soloviev, Recognition of earthquake prone areas in the altai sayan Baikal region based on the morphostructural zoning, Russian Journal of Earth Sciences, 21, ES1005,doihttps://doi.org/10.2205/2020ES000751, 2021.
17. Heidbach, O., M. Rajabi, K. Reiter, and M. Ziegler, World stress map 2016, GFZ Data Services, 2,doihttps://doi.org/10.5880/WSM.2016.002, 2016.
18. Hickman, S., M. Zoback, and W. Ellsworth, Introduction to special section: Preparing for the san-andreas fault observatory at depth, Geophysical Research Letters,31(12), doihttps://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020688, 2004.
19. Hooper, A., H. Zebker, P. Segall, and B. Kampes, Anew method for measuring deformation on volcanoes and other natural terrains using in sar persistent scatterers, Geophysical Research Letters, 31(23), L23,611,doihttps://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL021737, 2004.
20. Kreuzer, O., V. Markwitz, A. Porwal, and T. McCuaig, A continentwide study of australia’s uranium potential: Part i: Gis assisted manual prospectivity analysis, Ore Geology Reviews, 38(4), 334-366,doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2010.08.003,2010.
21. Kurlenia, M. V., V. M. Seryakov, and A. A. Yeremenko, Technogenic geomechanical stress fields, 264 pp., Novosibirsk: Nauka, (in Russian), 2005.
22. Laverov, N., and D. Rundkvist (Eds.), Large and superlarge deposits of ore minerals (Three Volumes), IGEM RAS, Moscow, (in Russian), 2020.
23. Luhnev, A. V., V. A. Sankov, A. I. Miroshnichenko, et al., Rotation of the earth’s surface deformation in the Baikal mongolian region according to gps measurement, Geology and Geophysics, 51(7), 1006-1017, 2010.
24. Mallet, J.L., Space-time mathematical framework for sedimentary geology, Mathematical Geology, 36(1), 1-32, doihttps://doi.org/10.1023/b:matg.0000016228.75495.7c, 2004.
25. Mallet, J.L., and A.L. Tertois, 3d restoration of sedimentary terrains: The geochron approach, arXiv preprintarXiv:2105.06137, 2021.
26. OSR97, Set of maps for general seismic zoning of the territory of the Russian Federation (OSR97), (in Russian),1999.
27. Petrov, V. A., A. V. Vesdovskiy, and D. A. Kuzmina, Modeling and monitoring of geodynamic situation with the help of geoinformation system, Scientific Review, (8),133-138, (in Russian), 2014.
28. Petrov, V. A., Yu. L. Rebetsky, V. V. Poluektov, and A. A. Burmistrov, Tectonophysics of Hydrothermal Ore Formation: an Example of the Antei Mo-U Deposit, Transbaikalia, Geology of Ore Deposits, 57(4), 292-312,doihttps://doi.org/10.1134/s1075701515040030, 2015.
29. Petrov, V. A., O. V. Andreeva, V. V. Poluektov, and D. V. Kovalenko, Tectono Magmatic Cycles and Geodynamic Settings of Ore Bearing System Formation in the Southern Cis Argun Region, Geology of Ore Deposits, 59(6),431-452, doihttps://doi.org/10.1134/s1075701517060034, 2017a.
30. Petrov, V. A., A. B. Leksin, V. V. Pogorelov, Yu. L. Rebetsky, V. A. San’kov, S. V. Ashurkov, and I. Yu. Rasskazov, Geodynamic simulation of ore bearing geological structural units by the example of the Strel’tsovka uranium ore field, Geology of Ore Deposits, 59(3), 183-208,doihttps://doi.org/10.1134/s1075701517030047, 2017b.
31. Roeloffs, E., The Parkfield, California earthquake experiment: An update in 2000, Current Science, 79(9), 1226-1236, 2000.
32. Rostekhnadzor, Federal norms and rules in the field of atomic energy use accounting for external influences of natural and manmade origin on nuclear facilities(OIAE) NP06405, (in Russian), 2005.
33. SAFOD, San Andreas Fault Observatory at Depth, https://safod.icdponline.org/, accessed: 20210615,2021.
34. Sankov, V. A., K. G. Levi, A. V. Luhnev, and A. I. Miroshnichenko, Modern movements of lithospheric blocks incentral asia according to gps geodesy data, Actual issues of Central Asia modern geodynamic, pp. 165-179, (in Russian), 2005.
35. Sobolev, G. A., Concept of predictability of earthquakes based on the dynamics of seismicity under trigger action, pp. 15-43, IFZ RAS, Moscow, (in Russian), 2010.
36. Stein, S., and S. Mazzotti, Continental Intraplate Earthquakes: Science, Hazard, and Policy Issues, Geological Society of America, doihttps://doi.org/10.1130/SPE425, 2007.
37. Ulomov, V. I., and M. I. Bogdanov (Eds.), General seismic zoning of the territory of the Russian Federation. An explanatory note to maps’ set OSR2016 and a list of settlements located in seismically active zones, 73 pp., IFZ RAS, Moscow, (in Russian), 2017.
38. WSM, World Stress Map, http://www.worldstressmap.org/, accessed: 20210620,2021.
