Estimation of land surface temperature and distribution across Land use/land cover in response to coal mining activity in V. D. Yelevsky coal mine area – Russia
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):

Land surface temperature is an important factor in many areas, such as global climate change, hydrological, geophysical, biophysical, and land use land cover. This study attempts to retrieve the current statue of V. D. Yelevsky coal mine area in Russia and estimate Land surface temperature in the area of the years of 2006, 2010, and 2019. Furthermore, the study shows the distribution of land surface temperature among land use land cover in the area and implies spatial correlation between land surface temperature and normalized different vegetation index by using Landsat 5 and Landsat 8. The results show that the statue of coal mine portion has increased from 43.89 km² in 2006 to 111.40 km² in 2019. Also, in the three periods maximum images temperature was recorded in coal mine area (32.05°C in 2006, 31.24°C in 2010 and 32.81°C in 2019), while minimum temperature value of land use land cover types varies among the years. In 2006 minimum value of 12.36°C recorded in water bodies area, 12.36°C across forest area, and again 18.41°C across water bodies in 2019. Consequently, the average land surface temperature of overall area for the three observed years has increased from 18°C to 22.2°C, it means that changes of land surface temperature have been observed from the period of 2006 to 2019. On the other hand, the results show that land surface temperature and normalized different vegetation index for the three study years have strong negative correlations with 𝑅 square value of (𝑅² = 0.93 in 2006, 𝑅² = 0.99 in 2010 and 𝑅² = 0.87 in 2019) respectively.



Keywords:
Coal mine,remote sensing,Landsat 5 and 8,land surface temperature,normalized difference vegetation index
Text
Publication text (PDF): Read Download

 

References

1. Amiri, R., Q. Weng, et al. (2009), Spatial- temporal dynamics of land surface temperature in relation to fractional vegetation cover and land use/cover in the Tabriz urban area, Iran, Remote Sensing of Environment, 113, No. 12, 2606-2617, Crossref

2. Andr´e, C., C. Ottle, et al. (2015), Land surface temperature retrieval over circumpolar Arctic using SSM/I-SSMIS and MODIS data, Remote Sensing of Environment, 162, 1-10, Crossref

3. Avdan, U., G. Jovanovska (2016), Algorithm for automated mapping of land surface temperature using Landsat 8 Satellite data, Journal of Sensors, 2016, 1-8, Crossref

4. Becker, F., Li Zhao-Liang (1990), Towards a local split window method over land surfaces, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 11, No. 3, 369-393, Crossref

5. Chander, Gwanesh, Brian Markham (2003), Revised Landsat-5 TM Radiometric calibration procedures and post calibration dynamic ranges, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 41, No. 11, 2674-2677, Crossref

6. Ghulam, A. (2010), @empty

7. Ding, Haiyong, Wenzhong Shi (2013), Landuse/land-cover change and its infuence on surface temperature: A case study in Beijing city, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 34, No. 15, 5503- 5517, Crossref

8. Dontree, S. (2010), Relation of land surface temperature (LST) and land use/land cover (LULC) from Remotely sensed data in Chiang Mai - Lamphun basin, Online proceedings conference paper p. 23-26, SEGA, Hanoi, Vietnam.

9. Foody, G. M. (1992), On the compensation for chance agreement in image classifcation accuracy assessment, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 58, No. 10, 1459-1460, Crossref

10. Guo, Z., S. D. Wang, et al. (2012), Assess the efect of diferent degrees of urbanization on land surface temperature using remote sensing images, Procedia Environmental Sciences, 13, 935-942, Crossref

11. Hu, Zhenqi, Yang Guanghua, et al. (2014), Farmland damage and its impact on the overlapped areas of cropland and coal resources in the eastern plains of China, ELSEVIER, Recourses, Conservation and Recycling, 86, Crossref

12. Khorram, S. (1999), Accuracy Assessment of Remote Sensing-Derived Change Detection, American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Bethesda, MD.

13. Landsat Project Science Ofce (2002), National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Landsat 7 Science Data User’s Handbook, 186 pp. NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt. (http://land sathandbook.gsfc.nasa.gov/pdfs/Landsat7 Handbook .pdf)

14. Lunetta, R. S., J. Iiames, et al. (2001), An assessment of reference data variability using a virtual feld reference database, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 63, No. 6, 707-715,

15. Crossref

16. Ma, Z., R. L. Redmond (1995), Tau coefcients for accuracy assessment of classifcation of remote sensing data, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 61, No. 4, 435-439. (Corpus

17. ID:126955874)

18. Mallick, J., C. K. Singh, et al. (2012), Land surface emissivity retrieval based on moisture index from LANDSAT TM satellite data over heterogeneous surfaces of Delhi city, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 19, 348-358, Crossref

19. Niu, C., A. Musa, Y. Liu (2015), Analysis of soil moisture condition under diferent land uses in the arid region of Horqin sandy land, northern China, Solid Earth, 6, 1157-1167, Crossref

20. Owen, T. W., T. N. Carlson, R. R. Gillies (1998), An assessment of satellite remotely-sensed land cover parameters in quantitatively describing the climatic efect of urbanization, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 19, No. 19, 1663-1681, Crossref

21. Orhan, O., S. Ekercin, F. Dadaser-Celik (2014), Use of Landsat land surface temperature and vegetation indices for monitoring drought in the salt lake basin area, Turkey, The Scientifc World Journal, 2014, 1-11, (Article ID 142939)Crossref

22. Pal, S., S. Ziaul (2017), Detection of land use and land cover change and land surface temperature in English Bazar urban center, The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 20, No. 1, 125-145, Crossref

23. Ritesh, Kumar, Sharma Sadanand, et al. (2019), Environmental issues of coal mines and it’s allied industries: Suggestive measures for root level remedies, International conference and exhibition on energy and environment: Challenges and Opportunities

24. 1, p. 332-339, Vigyan Bnawan, New Delhi, India.

25. (http://cimfr.csircentral.net/id/eprint/2040)

26. Story, M., R. G. Congalton (1986), Accuracy assessment: A user’s perspective, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 52, No. 3, 397- 399, Crossref

27. Sospedra, F., V. Caselles, E. Valor (1998), Efective wavenumber for thermal infrared bands-application to Landsat-TM, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 19, No. 11, 2105-2117, Crossref

28. Townshend, J. R. J., C. O. Justice (2007), Analysis of the dynamics of African vegetation using the normalized diference vegetation index, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 7, No. 11, 1435-1445, Crossref

29. Ustin, S. (2004), Manual of Remote Sensing Remote Sensing for Natural Resource Management and Environmental Monitoring, Vol. 4, Third edition, 768 pp. John Wiley & Sons, California.

30. Xiao, Wu., Jiale Chen, et al. (2018), Inversion and analysis of maize biomass in coal mining subsidence area based on UAV images, Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 49, No. 8, 169-180, Crossref

31. Xiaoxiao, Li, Li Wenwen, et al. (2016), Remote sensing of the surface urban heat island and land architecture in Phoenix, Arizona: Combined efects of land composition and confguration and cadastraldemographic-economic factors, Remote Sensing of Environment, 174, 233-243, Crossref

32. Zhou, Q., M. Robson, P. Pilesjo (1998), On the ground estimation of vegetation cover in Australian rangelands, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 19, No. 9, 1815-1820, Crossref

Login or Create
* Forgot password?