St. Petersburg State University (inzhener-issledovatel')
employee
Russian Federation
A comparative assessment of the contribution of eddies and other dynamic structures to the energy of the Lofoten Basin is carried out. The basis of the study is the data of global ocean reanalysis GLORYS12V1 for 1993–2019. We estimate the total kinetic and potential energy as well as the corresponding contribution of eddy energy for a region bounded by an isobath of 3000 m. We use the method of automatic identification of vortices for the analysis which allows us to calculate the eddy kinetic and potential energy in the automatically selected areas of the eddies. We establish that the potential energy of both cyclones and anticyclones is on average 2–3 times higher than the kinetic energy values, and the energy values of kinetic and potential for anticyclones dominate relative to the energy of cyclones. We also consider the interannual variability and seasonal course of eddy kinetic and potential energy. The seasonal course revealed an increase in both types of energy in the winter months. It is established that the contribution of eddies to the total energy of the basin is small. The contribution of eddy kinetic energy to the total energy of the basin is 7.3%, and the contribution of eddy potential energy is 8.4%. This means that the main contribution to the energy of the basin is made not by mesoscale eddies, but by other dynamic structures i.e. filaments and background flow.
Lofoten Basin, mesoscale vortices, kinetic and potential energy, filaments, identification method, GLORYS12V1
1. Artal, O., et al. (2019), Detecting and characterizing upwelling filaments in a numerical ocean model, Computers & Geosciences, 122, 25-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2018.10.005.
2. Belonenko, T. V., et al. (2021), Topographic experiments over dynamical processes in the Norwegian Sea, Russ. J. Earth. Sci., 21, ES1006, doihttps://doi.org/10.2205/2020ES000747.
3. Belonenko, T. V., et al. (2020), Evaluation of Heat and Salt Transports by Mesoscale Eddies in the Lofoten Basin, Russ. J. Earth Sci., 20, ES6011. doihttps://doi.org/10.2205/2020ES000720.
4. Dritschel, D. G. (1989), On the stabilization of a two-dimensional vortex trip by adverse hear, J. Fluid Mech., 206, 193-221.
5. Faghmous, J. H., et al. (2015), A daily global mesoscale ocean eddy dataset from satellite altimetry, Scientific Data, 2, 150028, DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2015.28
6. Gordeeva, S., et al. (2020), Statistical analysis of long-lived mesoscale eddies in the Lofoten Basin from satellite altimetry, Advances in Space Research, 68, 2, 364-377. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2020.05.043.
7. Kida, S., (1981), Motion of an Elliptic Vortex in Uniform shear flow, J. phys. Soc. Japan, 50, No. 10. 3517-3520.
8. McWilliams, J. C., F. Colas, M. J. Molemaker, (2009), Cold filamentary intensification and oceanic surface convergence lines, Geophysical Research Letters, 36, L18602, doihttps://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL039402.
9. Raj, R.P., et al. (2015), The Lofoten Vortex of the Nordic Seas, Deep-Sea Research I, 96, 1-14, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2014.10.011.
10. Raj, R.P., et al. (2016), Quantifying mesoscale eddies in the Lofoten Basin, J. Geophys. Res. Oceans, 121, 4503-4521, doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC011637.
11. Raj, R. P., et al. (2020), Interaction between mesoscale eddies and the gyre circulation in the Lofoten Basin. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans. 125, I. 7. e2020JC016102. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC016102.
12. Sandalyuk, N. V., T. V. Belonenko (2021), Seasonal Variability of the Thermohaline Structure of the Mesoscale Eddies in the Lofoten Basin. Fundamentalnaya i Prikladnaya Gidrofizika, 14, No. 1, 15-30. doi:https://doi.org/10.7868/S2073667321010020. (in Russian).
13. Travkin, V. S., T. V. Belonenko (2019), Seasonal variability of mesoscale eddies of the Lofoten Basin using satellite and model data. Russian Journal of Earth Sciences, 19, No. 5, ES5004, doihttps://doi.org/10.2205/2019ES000676.
14. Travkin, V. S., T. V. Belonenko (2021), Study of the Mechanisms of Vortex Variability in the Lofoten Basin Based on Energy Analysis, Physical Oceanography, [e-journal] 28(3), 294-308. doihttps://doi.org/10.22449/1573-160X-2021-3-294-308.
15. Volkov, D. L., T. V. Belonenko, V. R. Foux (2013), Puzzling over the dynamics of the Lofoten Basin - a sub-Arctic hot spot of ocean variability. Geophysical Research Letters, 40, I. 4, 738-743. doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50126.
16. Zhmur, V. V. (2011), Mesoscale eddies of Global Ocean, GEOS, Moscow. 280. (in Russian).
17. Zhmur, V. V., K. K. Pankratov (1990), Dynamics of mesoscale vortex formation in the flow field of a large intense vortex, Oceanology, 30, No. 2, 170-178. (in Russian).
18. Zhmur, V.V., E. V. Novoselova, T. V. Belonenko (2021), Potential vorticity in the Ocean: Ertel and Rossby approaches with estimates for the Lofoten Vortex, Izv. Atmos. Ocean. Phys., 57, No. 6, 632-641, DOI:https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001433821050157.
19. Zhmur, V. V., E. V. Novoselova, T. V. Belonenko (2021), Peculiarities of Formation the of Density Field in Mesoscale Eddies of the Lofoten Basin: Part 1. Oceanology, 61, No. 6, 830-838. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001437021060333.
20. Zhmur, V. V., E. V. Novoselova, T. V. Belonenko (2022), Peculiarities of Formation the of Density Field in Mesoscale Eddies of the Lofoten Basin: Part 2. Oceanology, 62, No. 3, 289-302. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001437022030171.
21. Zinchenko, V. A., et al. (2019), Analysis of Mesoscale eddies in the Lofoten Basin based on satellite altimetry, Fundamentalnaya i Prikladnaya Gidrofizika, 12, No. 3, 46-54, DOI:https://doi.org/10.7868/S2073667319030067.
