Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
Russian Federation
VAC 1.6 Науки о Земле и окружающей среде
UDK 550.8.05 Обработка результатов исследований и интерпретация данных исследований
UDK 550.837.3 Метод постоянного тока
UDK 55 Геология. Геологические и геофизические науки
UDK 550.34 Сейсмология
UDK 550.383 Главное магнитное поле Земли
GRNTI 37.01 Общие вопросы геофизики
GRNTI 37.15 Геомагнетизм и высокие слои атмосферы
GRNTI 37.25 Океанология
GRNTI 37.31 Физика Земли
GRNTI 38.01 Общие вопросы геологии
GRNTI 36.00 ГЕОДЕЗИЯ. КАРТОГРАФИЯ
GRNTI 37.00 ГЕОФИЗИКА
GRNTI 38.00 ГЕОЛОГИЯ
GRNTI 39.00 ГЕОГРАФИЯ
GRNTI 52.00 ГОРНОЕ ДЕЛО
OKSO 05.00.00 Науки о Земле
BBK 26 Науки о Земле
TBK 63 Науки о Земле. Экология
BISAC SCI SCIENCE
In the last decade, the intensity of development of the Gorlovskoye coal deposit has increased significantly, which leads to the formation of seismic activation of the subsoil of the Gorlovka depression in response to man-made impact. Since 2019, earthquakes with a magnitude of more than 4 have been recorded in the area of the deposit, felt in Novosibirsk and its suburbs. The main objective of the study: as data accumulates, to identify the criteria for seismic activations using one of the methods of ground-based electrical exploration – electrical resistivity tomography. The article considers the geoelectric structure of the Gorlovka depression in the area of the transition from its deposits to the Salair ridge, and also analyzes the results of monitoring carried out in 2023 by the electrical resistivity tomography method along a profile intersecting one of the fault structures. The monitoring observation profile is located on a site selected during experimental and methodological work and is located just a few kilometers from coal quarries and the zone of concentration of seismic events. It was found that the identified variations in geoelectric parameters reflect the reaction of the geological environment not only to earthquakes occurring during the observation period, but also to man-made impacts (explosions).
Gorlovskaya depression, natural and man-made seismicity, geophysical monitoring, electrical resistivity tomography, electrical conductivity variations, measurement techniques, software, inversion
1. Adushkin V. V., Turuntaev S. B. Man-made seismicity – induced and triggered. — Moscow : IDG RAS, 2015. — EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TXLGWD.;
2. Earthquakes and microseismicity in modern geodynamics problems on the East European platform. Part 2. Microseismicity / ed. by N. V. Sharov, A. A. Malovichko, Y. K. Shchukin. — Petrozavodsk : Karelian Scientific Center of the RAS, 2007.; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21455/VIS2019.4-2; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZKVXYE
3. Emanov A. F., Emanov A. A., Fateev A. V. Bachatskiy induced earthquake on June 18, 2013, 𝑀L = 6.1, 𝐼0 = 7 (Kuzbass) // Russian Journal of Seismology. — 2020a. — Vol. 2, no. 1. — P. 48–61. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.35540/2686-7907.2020.1.05.; ; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/NFOYQV
4. Emanov A. F., Emanov A. A., Fateev A. V., et al. Technogenic seismic activization in Kuzbass and mountain Shoria // Bulletin of the Scientific Center of VostNII Industrial and Environmental Safety. — 2020b. — Vol. 2. — P. 5–18. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.25558/VOSTNII.2020.94.41.001.; ; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LHBFYE
5. Emanov A. F., Emanov A. A., Fateev A. V., et al. Technogenic seismic activation in Gorlovsky coal basin area // Fundamental and applied issues of mining. — 2021. — Vol. 8, no. 1. — P. 207–210. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.15372/FPVGN2021080132.; ; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HOUDJN
6. Emanov A. F., Emanov A. A., Pavlenko O. V., et al. Kolyvan earthquake 09.01.2019 with 𝑀L = 4.3 and features of induced seismicity in the conditions of the Gorlovsky coal basin // Problems of Engineering Seismology. — 2019. — Vol. 46, no. 4. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.21455/vis2019.4-2.
7. Emanov A. F., Emanov A. A., Pavlenko O. V., et al. Kolyvan Earthquake of January 9, 2019, with 𝑀L = 4.3 and Induced Seismicity Features of the Gorlovsky Coal Basin // Seismic Instruments. — 2020c. — Vol. 56, no. 3. — P. 254–268. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.3103/S0747923920030020.; DOI: https://doi.org/10.15372/FTPRPI20210402; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZUBBZN
8. Geophysical Survey of RAS. Last EarthQuake (by Alert Service). — 1993. — (visited on 2024/08/05). http://www.gsras.ru/new/ssd.htm
9. Kishkina S. B., Kocharyan G. G., Budkov A. M., et al. Impact of Open Pit Mining in Gorlovka Coal Basin on Large Earthquakes // Journal of Mining Science. — 2021. — Vol. 57, no. 4. — P. 546–556. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.1134/s1062739121040025.; DOI: https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7900-2023-21-3-32-45; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/MMBHSV
10. Kotelnikov A. D., Maksikov S. V., Kotelnikova I. V., et al. State Geological Map of the Russian Federation. Scale 1:200,000. Second Edition. Kuzbass Series. Sheet N-44-XVIII – Cherepanovo. Explanatory Note. — Moscow : VSEGEI, 2015.; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZQZWVF
11. Nevedrova N. N., Epov M. I. Electromagnetic monitoring in seismically active regions of Siberia // Geophysical Journal. — 2012. — Vol. 34, no. 4. — P. 209–223.; DOI: https://doi.org/10.33764/2618-981X-2021-2-2-272-279; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/DDKPBZ
12. Nevedrova N. N., Shalaginov A. E., Marinenko A. V., et al. Software and Algorithmic Tools Development for Processing and Interpretation Electrotomography Monitoring Data // Vestnik NSU. Series: Information Technologies. — 2023. — Vol. 21, no. 3. — P. 32–45. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7900-2023-21-3-32-45.
13. Sanchaa A. M., Nevedrova N. N., Babushkin S. M., et al. First results of studies in the Gorlovskaya values by ground methods of electric exploration with controlled sources // Interexpo GEO-Siberia. — 2021. — Vol. 2, no. 2. — P. 272–279. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.33764/2618-981X-2021-2-2-272-279.
14. Shalaginov A. E., Nevedrova N. N., Babushkin S. M. Geoelectric structure of fault zone of the Gorlovka depression of Novosibirsk region according to the TEM data // Interexpo GEO-Siberia. — 2023. — Vol. 2, no. 4. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.33764/2618-981X-2023-2-4-61-67.; ; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BJJWTM
15. Shalaginov A. E., Nevedrova N. N., Shaparenko I. O. Variations in electrophysical parameters estimated from electromagnetic monitoring data as an indicator of fault activity // Geodynamics & Tectonophysics. — 2018. — Vol. 9, no. 1. — P. 93–107. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2018-9-1-0339.; ; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XVEWSD
16. Shaparenko I. O., Nevedrova N. N. Application of the electrical resistivity tomography method for studying fault structures (using the Altai Mountains as an example) // Geosochi-2022. Current state and development prospects of engineering geophysics. — Tver : PoliPRESS, 2022. — P. 14–17. — EDN: https://elibrary.ru/THRFMF.;
17. Sotnikov V. I., Fedoseyev G. S., Kungurtsev L. V., et al. Geodynamics, magmatism, and metallogeny of the Kolyvan-Tomsk folded zone. — Novosibirsk : SB RAS, NRC OIGGM, 1999.; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/s0747923920030020; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XRKWBQ
