сотрудник с 01.01.2018 по настоящее время
Сахалинский филиал Федерального исследовательского центра "Единая геофизическая служба Российской академии наук" (отдел геофизических исследований, начальник)
сотрудник с 01.01.2012 по настоящее время
г. Южно-Сахалинск, Сахалинская область, Россия
Сахалинский филиал Федерального исследовательского центра "Единая геофизическая служба Российской академии наук"
Южно-Сахалинск, Сахалинская область, Россия
УДК 55 Геология. Геологические и геофизические науки
УДК 550.34 Сейсмология
УДК 550.383 Главное магнитное поле Земли
ГРНТИ 37.01 Общие вопросы геофизики
ГРНТИ 37.15 Геомагнетизм и высокие слои атмосферы
ГРНТИ 37.25 Океанология
ГРНТИ 37.31 Физика Земли
ГРНТИ 38.01 Общие вопросы геологии
ГРНТИ 36.00 ГЕОДЕЗИЯ. КАРТОГРАФИЯ
ГРНТИ 37.00 ГЕОФИЗИКА
ГРНТИ 38.00 ГЕОЛОГИЯ
ГРНТИ 39.00 ГЕОГРАФИЯ
ГРНТИ 52.00 ГОРНОЕ ДЕЛО
ОКСО 05.00.00 Науки о Земле
ББК 26 Науки о Земле
ТБК 63 Науки о Земле. Экология
BISAC SCI SCIENCE
In April 2024, an engineering seismometric station was installed in a residential building in Severo-Kurilsk (Paramushir Island, Sakhalin Oblast) to obtain information about the vibrations of structures and adjacent ground areas during earthquakes as part of seismic observations conducted by the Sakhalin Branch of the Geophysical Survey of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Based on the obtained data on the intensity of the Kamchatka earthquake of July 29 (30), 2025, MW = 8.8, in residential buildings in Severo-Kurilsk, the development of the seismic process before and after the earthquake was analyzed. The obtained data were compared with data from a stationary seismic station in Severo-Kurilsk, located 900 m from the residential building. Both stations are equipped with strong vibration sensors installed in different conditions. Of the 1,790 earthquakes (with a magnitude of M ≥ 3.5) recorded by the regional seismic network from July 29 to October 15, 2025, 195 events with an intensity of I ≥ 3.6 impacted residential buildings. Of these 195 earthquakes, 14 had an impact magnitude of I ≥ 6.0, and the main directions of the axes of maximum impact on residential buildings were east–west and north–south. The study results demonstrate that integrating engineering and technical monitoring into the urban environment is an important element of seismic risk reduction strategies and operational decision-making after strong earthquakes.
Engineering seismometric station, seismic process, accelerometer, instrumental intensity, Kamchatka megathrust earthquake
1. Aptikaev F. F., Erteleva O. O., Berzhinsky Yu. A., et al. Project of a new Russian seismic scale // Engineering Survey. — 2011. — No. 10. — P. 62–71. — (In Russian).
2. Chebrov D. V. The Mw = 8.8 Kamchatka megathrust earthquake of july 29, 2025 // Bulletin of Kamchatka Regional Association «Educational-Scientific Center». Earth Sciences. — 2025. — 3(67). — P. 113–117. — https://doi.org/10.31431/1816-5524-2025-3-67-113-117 — (In Russian).
3. Chebrov D. V., Droznin D. V., Matveenko D. V., et al. Prototype of a system for monitoring actual seismic impacts on buildings and structures of Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky based on instrumental data // Problems of complex geophysical monitoring of seismoactive regions: Proceedings of the Eighth All-Russian scientific-technical conference with international participation, Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, September 26 - October 2, 2021. — Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky : GS RAS, 2021. — P. 372–377. — https://doi.org/10.35540/903258-451.2021.8.70 — (In Russian).
4. Chebrov V. N., Gusev A. A., Gusyakov V. K., et al. Concept for developing a seismologic observation system for tsunami warning in the Russian Far East // Seismic Instruments. — 2010. — Vol. 46, no. 3. — P. 275–285. — https://doi.org/10.3103/s0747923910030096
5. Droznin D. V., Chebrov D. V., Droznina S. Y., et al. Automated Estimation of Seismic Shaking Intensity from Instrumental Data in Quasi-Real-time Mode and Its Use in the Operation of the of Seismic Early Warning Service in the Kamchatka Region // Seismic Instruments. — 2018. — Vol. 54, no. 3. — P. 239–246. — https://doi.org/10.3103/s0747923918030088
6. Droznin D. V. and Droznina S. Y. Interactive DIMAS program for processing seismic signals // Seismic Instruments. — 2011. — Vol. 47, no. 3. — P. 215–224. — https://doi.org/10.3103/s0747923911030054
7. Guryev V. V., Dorofeev V. M. and Bulykin V. I. Engineering Seismometric Monitoring for Calculation Structures,Prediction of Seismic Resistance and Maintenance Civil Objects in Operation // Academia. Architecture and Construction. — 2023. — No. 3. — P. 119–131. — https://doi.org/10.22337/2077-9038-2023-3-119-131 — (In Russian).
8. Kostenko I. S., Zaytsev A. I. and Pelinovsky E. N. Tsunami on July 29 (30), 2025 in the Kamchatka-Kuril Zone: Instrumental Observation and Modeling // Doklady Earth Sciences. — 2025. — Vol. 525, no. 2. — https://doi.org/10.1134/s1028334x25608648
9. Kostylev D. V. Formation of a unified system for collecting seismological information in the Sakhalin Division GS RAS // Russian Journal of Seismology. — 2021. — Vol. 3, no. 1. — P. 41–53. — https://doi.org/10.35540/2686-7907.2021.1.03 — (In Russian).
10. Kostylev D. V. and Kostyleva N. V. Development of engineering seismic monitoring methods in seismically active regions using the example of seismometric stations on Shikotan Island // Physics of Geospheres. — Vladivostok : V.I. Il’ichev Pacific Oceanological Institute FEB RAS, 2025a. — P. 119–122. — https://doi.org/10.62994/dvo.2025.37.25.027 — (In Russian).
11. Kostylev D. V. and Kostyleva N. V. System of engineering seismometric observations on the Kuril Islands under conditions of constant intensive seismic impacts // Natural and technogenic risks. Safety of structures. — 2025b. — Vol. 81, no. 6. — P. 30–37. — (In Russian).
12. Kostylev D. V., Kostyleva N. V. and Shchukin M. A. Seismological data information system in the Sakhalin Branch of the GS RAS // Russian Journal of Seismology. — 2025. — Vol. 7, no. 4. — P. 46–59. — https://doi.org/10.35540/2686-7907.2025.4.06 — (In Russian).
13. Medvedev S., Sponheuer W. and Kárník V. Neue seismische Skala // 7. Tagung der Europäischen Seismologischen Kommission vom 24.9. bis 30.9. 1962 in Jena, DDR. — De Gruyter, 1964. — P. 69–76. — https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112756430-019
14. Mikhailov V. O., Konvisar A. M., Smirnov V. B., et al. The Rupture Surface Model of the July 29, 2025 Mw 8.8 Kamchatka Earthquake Based on Satellite Geodesy and Interferometry Data // Doklady Earth Sciences. — 2025. — Vol. 525, no. 2. — https://doi.org/10.1134/s1028334x25608752
15. Mishatkin V. N., Zakharchenko N. Z. and Chebrov V. N. Hardware for the seismic subsystem of the tsunami warning service // Seismic Instruments. — 2012. — Vol. 48, no. 1. — P. 16–33. — https://doi.org/10.3103/s0747923912010100
16. SEISAN Earthquake analysis software for Windows, Solaris, Linux and Macosx. Version 9.0.1 / ed. by L. Ottemöller, P. Voss and J. Havskov. — SEISAN, 2011.
17. Titov E. Yu., Agafonov V. M., Neeshpapa A. V., et al. Measuring complexes to monitor railway facilities in seismically hazardous regions // Put’ i Putevoye Khozyaystvo. — 2021. — No. 2. — P. 27–31. — (In Russian).
