Институт прикладной геофизики имени Е. К. Фёдорова
Россия
Геофизический центр РАН
Институт прикладной геофизики имени Е. К. Фёдорова
Москва, г. Москва и Московская область, Россия
This article covers a nouveau idea of a way to collect and handle geophysical data with a peer-to-peer network in near real-time. The text covers a brief introduction to the cause, the technology, and the particular case of collecting data from Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) stations. We describe the proof-of-concept implementation that has been tested. The test was conducted with an experimental GNSS station and a data aggregation facility. In the test, original raw GNSS signal measurements were transferred to the data aggregation center and subsequently to the consumer. Our implementation utilized the BitTorrent protocol to communicate and transfer data. The solution could be used to enable the majority of data aggregation centers for fast, reliable, and transparent real-time data handling experience for the benefit of the scientific community.
data center, data handling, data acquisition, peer-to-peer network, geophysical observations, GNSS raw, BitTorrent, P2P, GNSS
1. Ahern, T., R. Benson, R. Casey, C. Trabant, and B. Weertman (2014), Improvements in Data Quality Integration and Reliability: New Developments at the IRIS DMC, Advances in Geosciences, 40, 31-35, doihttps://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-40-31-2015.
2. Aleshin, I., S. Burguchev, K. Kholodkov, V. Alpatov, and A. Vasiliev (2014), Data Handling in GNSS Receiver Network and Ionosphere Monitoring Service Solution, in 2014 International Conference on Engineering and Telecommunication, pp. 122-125, doihttps://doi.org/10.1109/EnT.2014.32.
3. Aleshin, I. M., K. I. Kholodkov, and V. N. Koryagin (2020), Framework for GREIS-formatted GNSS data manipulation, GPS Solutions, 24(2), 63, doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-020-0971-7.
4. Bhatia, M., and M. K. Rai (2017), Identifying P2P traffic: A survey, Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, 10(5), 1182-1203, doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-016-0471-2.
5. Borgman, C. L. (2019), The Lives and After Lives of Data, Harvard Data Science Review, 1(1), doihttps://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.9a36bdb6.
6. Cohen, B. (2008), The BitTorrent Protocol Specification, http://bittorrent.org/beps/bep_0003.html.
7. Galkin, I. A., B. W. Reinisch, and R. Gamache (2006), Standard Archiving Output (SAO) Format, University of Massachusetts Lowell.
8. GNSS (2019), Javad GNSS Inc. and GNSS Receiver External Interface Specification, Revision 3.7.6 Edition.
9. Havskov, J., L. Ottem?ller, A. Trnkoczy, and P. Bormann (2012), Seismic Networks, New Manual of Seismological Observatory Practice 2 (NMSOP2), doihttps://doi.org/10.2312/GFZ.NMSOP-2_CH8.
10. Infrastructure Committee Central Bureau (2015), IGS Site Guidelines.
11. Ivanov, S. D., I. M. Aleshin, V. N. Koryagin, F. V. Perederin, and K. I. Kholodkov (2019), Geophysical data aggregation center IPE RAS, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, in Proceedings of the V International Conference Information Technologies in Earth Sciences and Applications for Geology, Mining and Economy (ITES&MP2019) Moscow, Russia, October 14-18, pp. 52-56.
12. Klingberg, T., and R. Manfredi (2002), Gnutella 0.6, Gnutella Protocol Development.
13. Kulbak, Y., and D. Bickson (2005), The eMule Protocol Specification, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem.
14. Maymounkov, P., and D. Mazi?res (2002), Kademlia: A Peer-to-Peer Information System Based on the XOR Metric, in Peer-to-Peer Systems, edited by P. Druschel, F. Kaashoek, and A. Rowstron, pp. 53-65, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg.
15. Norberg, A. (2012), Torrent RSS Feeds, http://bittorrent.org/beps/bep_0036.html.
16. Observatories Subcommittee (2022), INTERMAGNET Observatory Application Form, https://intermagne t.github.io/membership.html, Acessed: November 2022.
17. Perkins, R. (2008), Zeroconf Peer Advertising and Discovery, http://bittorrent.org/beps/bep_0026.html.
18. Romero, I. (Ed.) (2020), The Receiver Independent Exchange Format, ESA/ESOC/Navigation Support Office, Darmstadt, Germany.
19. Saul, J. (2014), Seismic waveform data retrieval, in New Manual of Seismological Observatory Practice 2 (NMSOP-2), Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum Gfz, doihttps://doi.org/10.2312/GFZ.NMSOP-2_IS_8.3.
20. Stone, J., and C. Partridge (2000), When the CRC and TCP Checksum Disagree, in Proceedings of the Conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication, SIGCOMM ’00, pp. 309-319, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, doihttps://doi.org/10.1145/347059.347561.
21. The 8472 (2015), Local Service Discovery, http://bitt orrent.org/beps/bep_0014.html.
22. u-Blox (2020), u-Blox AG, F9 High Precision GNSS Receiver Interface Description.
23. Zhang, Z., Y. Lin, Y. Chen, Y. Xiong, J. Shen, H. Liu, B. Deng, and X. Li (2009), Experimental Study of Broadcatching in BitTorrent, in 2009 6th IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference, pp. 1-5, doihttps://doi.org/10.1109/CCNC.2009.4784862.
