Россия
с 01.01.2016 по настоящее время
Россия
УДК 550.34 Сейсмология
УДК 55 Геология. Геологические и геофизические науки
УДК 550.383 Главное магнитное поле Земли
ГРНТИ 37.01 Общие вопросы геофизики
ГРНТИ 37.15 Геомагнетизм и высокие слои атмосферы
ГРНТИ 37.25 Океанология
ГРНТИ 37.31 Физика Земли
ГРНТИ 38.01 Общие вопросы геологии
ГРНТИ 36.00 ГЕОДЕЗИЯ. КАРТОГРАФИЯ
ГРНТИ 37.00 ГЕОФИЗИКА
ГРНТИ 38.00 ГЕОЛОГИЯ
ГРНТИ 39.00 ГЕОГРАФИЯ
ГРНТИ 52.00 ГОРНОЕ ДЕЛО
ОКСО 05.00.00 Науки о Земле
ББК 26 Науки о Земле
ТБК 63 Науки о Земле. Экология
BISAC SCI SCIENCE
The effects of radiation directivity of finite-fault sources of strong earthquakes have been recognized for a long time. However, only in recent decades, with the development of dense networks of seismic observation, representative data become available, allowing for a detailed study of these effects. Since the 2000s, seismologists have found evidence of super-shear crack propagation in strong earthquakes, resulting in shock fronts (Mach cones) formed by the interference of seismic waves radiated by the crack tip. This phenomenon leads to high peak ground acceleration (PGA) and peak ground velocity (PGV) values recorded in the near-fault zones. In such cases, significant damage occurs in the near-fault zones due to high-amplitude narrow velocity pulses impacting buildings (on fault-parallel components), followed by shaking of another type, caused by trailing Rayleigh ruptures (with dominant fault-normal components). This double punch effect can be particularly destructive to structures. Such phenomena were observed during the earthquakes in Turkey in February 2023. During large subduction earthquakes, due to the geometry of the fault plane, constructive interference of seismic waves and the formation of shock wave fronts are possible without super-shear crack propagation, i.e., with its propagation at normal velocity. Shock fronts were also observed but at considerable distances from the faults, where the resulting damage was relatively minor. This reduced impact is attributed to the high-frequency nature of the strong motions, which pose less risk to buildings. Additionally, the shock fronts, being farther from the sources, were weakened by attenuation mechanisms. Such phenomena are typically observed on large faults with small amounts of asperities, i.e., on faults where earthquakes occur regularly, and asperities are smoothed out, for example, on the North Anatolian and East Anatolian faults in Turkey, on active faults in Tibet, and during large subduction earthquakes.
Directivity effects, pulse-like waveforms, large subduction and crustal earthquakes, seismic hazard analysis, abnormally high PGA and PGV
1. Abdelmeguid M., Zhao C., Yalcinkaya E., et al. Dynamics of episodic supershear in the 2023 M7.8 Kahramanmaraş/Pazarcik earthquake, revealed by near-field records and computational modeling // Communications Earth and Environment. — 2023. — Vol. 4, no. 1. — https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-01131-7.
2. Abrahamson N. A. Seismological aspects of near-fault ground motions // Proceedings of the 5th Caltrans Seismic Research Workshop. — California Department of Transportation, 1998.
3. Abrahamson N. A. Effects of rupture directivity on probabilistic seismic hazard analysis // Proceedings of the EERI 6th Seismic Zonation Workshop. — Palm Springs, California : EERI, 2000. — P. 6.
4. Abrahamson N. A. Incorporating effects of near fault tectonic deformation into design ground motions. — a presentation sponsored by EERI Visiting Professional Program, University at Buffalo, 2001.
5. Abrahamson N. A. and Somerville P. G. Effects of the hanging wall and footwall on ground motions recorded during the Northridge earthquake // Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. — 1996. — Vol. 86, 1B. — S93–S99. — https://doi.org/10.1785/bssa08601b0s93.
6. Aki K. Seismic displacements near a fault // Journal of Geophysical Research. — 1968. — Vol. 73, no. 16. — P. 5359– 5376. — https://doi.org/10.1029/jb073i016p05359.
7. Akkar S., Yazgan U. and Gulkan P. Drift estimates in frame buildings subjected to near-fault ground motions // Journal of Structural Engineering. — 2005. — Vol. 131, no. 7. — P. 1014–1024. — https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2005)131:7(1014).
8. Alavi B. and Krawinkler H. Effects of near-fault ground motions on frame structures. — The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Department of Civil, Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, 2001. — 301 p.
9. Anderson J. C. and Bertero V. Uncertainties in establishing design earthquakes // Journal of Structural Engineering. — 1987. — Vol. 113, no. 8. — P. 1709–1724. — https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1987)113:8(1709).
10. Applied Technology Council. ATC-33 Project. NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings (FEMA publication 273). — Washington, D.C. : Federal Emergency Management Agency, 1997.
11. Applied Technology Council. ATC-40 Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings. Volume 1 and 2. — Seismic Safety Commission, 1996.
12. Archuleta R. J. and Hartzell S. H. Effects of fault finiteness on near-source ground motion // Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. — 1981. — Vol. 71, no. 4. — P. 939–957. — https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0710040939.
13. AS 1170.4 SUPP 1-1993. Minimum design loads on structures (known as the SAA Loading Code), Part 4: Earthquake loads - Commentary (Supplement to AS 1170.4-1993). — Standards Australia, 1993.
14. Baez J. I. and Miranda E. Amplification Factors to Estimate Inelastic Displacement Demands for the Design of Structures in the Near Field // Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. — 2000.
15. Baker J. W. Quantitative Classification of Near-Fault Ground Motions Using Wavelet Analysis // Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. — 2007. — Vol. 97, no. 5. — P. 1486–1501. — https://doi.org/10.1785/0120060255.
16. Baltzopoulos G., Baraschino R., Chioccarelli E., et al. Near-source ground motion in the M7.8 Gaziantep (Turkey) earthquake // Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics. — 2023a. — Vol. 52, no. 12. — P. 3903–3912. — https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3939.
17. Baltzopoulos G., Baraschino R., Chioccarelli E., et al. Preliminary engineering report on ground motion data of the Feb. 2023 Turkey seismic sequence // Earthquake reports. — 2023b. — P. 1–56.
18. Baltzopoulos G., Luzi L. and Iervolino I. Analysis of Near-Source Ground Motion from the 2019 Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence // Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. — 2020. — Vol. 110, no. 4. — P. 1495–1505. — https://doi.org/10.1785/0120200038.
19. Bertero V., Mahin S. and Herrera R. Problems in prescribing reliable design earthquakes // Proceedings of the 6th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. — 1977. — P. 1741–1746.
20. Bertero V., Mahin S. and Herrera R. Aseismic design implications of near-fault san fernando earthquake records // Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. — 1978. — Vol. 6, no. 1. — P. 31–42. — https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290060105.
21. Bouchon M., Bouin M.-P., Karabulut H., et al. How fast is rupture during an earthquake? New insights from the 1999 Turkey Earthquakes // Geophysical Research Letters. — 2001. — Vol. 28, no. 14. — P. 2723–2726. — https://doi.org/10.1029/2001gl013112.
22. Chiou B., Darragh R., Gregor N., et al. NGA Project Strong-Motion Database // Earthquake Spectra. — 2008. — Vol. 24, no. 1. — P. 23–44. — https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2894831.
23. Dunham E. and Bhat H. Attenuation of radiated ground motion and stresses from three-dimensional supershear ruptures // Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. — 2008. — Vol. 113, B8. — https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jb005182.
24. Furumura T., Takemura S., Noguchi S., et al. Strong ground motions from the 2011 off-the Pacific-Coast-of-Tohoku, Japan (Mw = 9.0) earthquake obtained from a dense nationwide seismic network // Landslides. — 2011. — Vol. 8, no. 3. — P. 333–338. — https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-011-0279-3.
25. Garini E. and Gazetas G. The 2 earthquakes of February 6th 2023 in Turkey & Syria. Second Preliminary Report (8-2-23) Emergence of Fault Rupture. Accelerograms NTUA. Greece. — ISSMGE, 2023.
26. Hall J., Heaton T., Halling M., et al. Near-source ground motion and its effects on flexible buildings // Earthquake Spectra. — 1995. — Vol. 11, no. 4. — P. 569–605. — https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585828.
27. Haskell N. A. Elastic displacements in the near-field of a propagating fault // Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. — 1969. — Vol. 59, no. 2. — P. 865–908. — https://doi.org/10.1785/bssa0590020865.
28. ICBO. Uniform Building Code. — USA : International Conference of Building Officials, 1997.
29. Ide S., Baltay A. and Beroza G. C. Shallow Dynamic Overshoot and Energetic Deep Rupture in the 2011 M w 9.0 Tohoku-Oki Earthquake // Science. — 2011. — Vol. 332, no. 6036. — P. 1426–1429. — https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1207020.
30. Iervolino I., Chioccarelli E. and Baltzopoulos G. Inelastic displacement ratio of near-source pulse-like ground motions // Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. — 2012. — Vol. 41, no. 15. — P. 2351–2357. — https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2167.
31. Iwan W. Drift Spectrum: Measure of Demand for Earthquake Ground Motions // Journal of Structural Engineering. — 1997. — Vol. 123, no. 4. — P. 397–404. — https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1997)123:4(397).
32. Kalkan E. and Kunnath S. K. Effects of fling-step and forward directivity on the seismic response of buildings // Earthquake Spectra. — 2006. — Vol. 22, no. 2. — P. 367–390. — https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2192560.
33. Koketsu K., Hikima K., Miyazaki S., et al. Joint inversion of strong motion and geodetic data for the source process of the 2003 Tokachi-oki, Hokkaido, earthquake // Earth, Planets and Space. — 2014. — Vol. 56, no. 3. — P. 329–334. — https://doi.org/10.1186/bf03353060.
34. Koketsu K., Yokota Y., Nishimura N., et al. A unified source model for the 2011 Tohoku earthquake // Earth and Planetary Science Letters. — 2011. — Vol. 310, no. 3/4. — P. 480–487. — https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2011.09.009.
35. Luco N. and Cornell C. Structure-specific scalar intensity measures for near-source and ordinary earthquake ground motions // Earthquake Spectra. — 2007. — Vol. 23, no. 2. — P. 357–392. — https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2723158.
36. Mahin S., Bertero V., Chopra A., et al. Response of the Olive View hospital main building during the San Fernando earthquake. Report No.: UCB/EERC-76/22. — Earthquake Engineering Research Center. University of California at Berkeley, 1976.
37. Makris N. and Black C. J. Dimensional analysis of bilinear oscillators under pulse-type excitations // Journal of Engineering Mechanics. — 2004. — Vol. 130, no. 9. — P. 1019–1031. — https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(2004)130:9(1019).
38. Malhotra P. M 7.8 Turkey Earthquake of February 6, 2023. — StrongMotion Knowledge, Clarity Inc., 2023.
39. Mavroeidis G., Dong G. and Papageorgiou A. Near-fault ground motions, and the response of elastic and inelastic single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) systems // Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. — 2004. — Vol. 33, no. 9. — P. 1023–1049. — https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.391.
40. Mavroeidis G. P. and Papageorgiou A. S. A mathematical representation of near-fault ground motion // Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. — 2003. — Vol. 93, no. 3. — P. 1099–1131. — https://doi.org/10.1785/0120020100.
41. Menun C. and Fu Q. An analytical model for near-fault ground motions and the response of SDOF systems // Proceedings of the 7th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering. — Oakland, California : Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, 2002. — P. 10.
42. Miyazawa M. Propagation of an earthquake triggering front from the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake // Geophysical Research Letters. — 2011. — Vol. 38, no. 23. — P. L23307. — https://doi.org/10.1029/2011gl049795.
43. NIED. National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience. — 2011. — URL: http://www.bosai.go.jp/e/index.html.
44. NZS 1170.5 Supp 1:2004. Structural Design Actions. Part 5 : Earthquake actions – New Zealand – Commentary. — Standards New Zealand, 2004.
45. Panza G. G. and Bella J. N. NDSHA: A new paradigm for reliable seismic hazard assessment // Engineering Geology. — 2020. — Vol. 275. — P. 105403. — https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105403.
46. Pavlenko O. V. Atypical soil behavior during the 2011 Tohoku earthquake (Mw = 9) // Journal of Seismology. — 2016. — Vol. 20, no. 3. — P. 803–826. — https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-016-9561-0.
47. Pavlenko O. V. Possible Mechanisms for Generation of Anomalously High PGA During the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake // Pure and Applied Geophysics. — 2017. — Vol. 174, no. 8. — P. 2909–2924. — https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-017-1558-2.
48. Pavlenko O. V. Influence of source directivity and site effects of 2003 Tokachi-oki earthquake on the generation of high PGA in the near-fault zones // Scientific Reports. — 2022. — Vol. 12, no. 1. — https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16085-7.
49. Pavlenko O. V. Effects of Source Directivity and Nonlinear Soil Behavior During the January, 1 2024 Noto Earthquake (Mw = 7.5) // Russian Journal of Earth Sciences. — 2024. — Vol. 24. — ES200. — https://doi.org/10.2205/2024es000909.
50. Pavlenko O. V. and Irikura K. Estimation of Nonlinear Time-dependent Soil Behavior in Strong Ground Motion Based on Vertical Array Data // Pure and Applied Geophysics. — 2003. — Vol. 160, no. 12. — P. 2365–2379. — https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-003-2398-9.
51. Pavlenko O. V. and Irikura K. Nonlinear Behavior of Soils Revealed from the Records of the 2000 Tottori, Japan, Earthquake at Stations of the Digital Strong-Motion Network Kik-Net // Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. — 2006. — Vol. 96, no. 6. — P. 2131–2145. — https://doi.org/10.1785/0120060069.
52. Petersen M. D., Toppozada T. R., Cao T., et al. Active fault near-source zones within and bordering the state of California for the 1997 Uniform Building Code // Earthquake Spectra. — 2000. — Vol. 16, no. 1. — P. 69–83. — https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586083.
53. Rosakis A., Abdelmeguid M. and Elbanna A. Evidence of Early Supershear Transition in the Feb 6th 2023 Mw 7.8 Kahramanmaraş Turkey Earthquake From Near-Field Records [Preprint] // EarthArXiv. — 2023. — https://doi.org/10.31223/x5w95g.
54. Rowshandel B. Incorporating source rupture characteristics into ground-motion hazard analysis models // Seismological Research Letters. — 2006. — Vol. 77, no. 6. — P. 708–722. — https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.77.6.708.
55. Shahi S. and Baker J. An empirically calibrated framework for including the effects of near-fault directivity in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis // Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. — 2011. — Vol. 101, no. 2. — P. 742– 755. — https://doi.org/10.1785/0120100090.
56. Somerville P. Magnitude scaling of the near fault rupture directivity pulse // Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors. — 2003. — Vol. 137, no. 1–4. — P. 201–212. — https://doi.org/10.1016/s0031-9201(03)00015-3.
57. Somerville P. Engineering characterization of near fault ground motion // New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering Conference. — 2005. — P. 8.
58. Somerville P., Saikia C., Wald D., et al. Implications of the Northridge earthquake for strong ground motions from thrust faults // Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. — 1996. — Vol. 86, 1B. — S115–S125. — https://doi.org/10.1785/bssa08601bs115.
59. Somerville P., Smith N., Graves R., et al. Representation of near-fault rupture directivity effects in design ground motions, and application to Caltrans bridges // Proceedings of the National Seismic Conference on Bridges and Highways. — San Diego, California, 1995.
60. Somerville P., Smith N., Graves R., et al. Modification of Empirical Strong Ground Motion Attenuation Relations to Include the Amplitude and Duration Effects of Rupture Directivity // Seismological Research Letters. — 1997. — Vol. 68, no. 1. — P. 199–222. — https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.68.1.199.
61. Spagnuolo E., Akinci A., Herrero A., et al. Implementing the effect of the rupture directivity on PSHA for the city of Istanbul, Turkey // Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. — 2016. — Vol. 106, no. 6. — P. 2599–2613. — https://doi.org/10.1785/0120160020.
62. Spudich P. and Chiou B. S. Directivity in NGA Earthquake Ground Motions: Analysis Using Isochrone Theory // Earthquake Spectra. — 2008. — Vol. 24, no. 1. — P. 279–298. — https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2928225.
63. Taftsoglou M., Valkaniotis S., Karantanellis E., et al. Preliminary mapping of liquefaction phenomena triggered by the February 6 2023 M7.7 earthquake, Türkiye / Syria, based on remote sensing data. — 2023. — https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.7668401.
64. Tajima F., Mori J. and Kennett B. L. N. A review of the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake (Mw 9.0): Large-scale rupture across heterogeneous plate coupling // Tectonophysics. — 2013. — Vol. 586. — P. 15–34. — https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2012.09.014.
65. Tothong P., Cornell C. A. and Baker J. Explicit directivity-pulse inclusion in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis // Earthquake Spectra. — 2007. — Vol. 23, no. 4. — P. 867–891. — https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2790487.
66. Zeng H., Wei S. and Rosakis A. A Travel-Time Path Calibration Strategy for Back-Projection of Large Earthquakes and Its Application and Validation Through the Segmented Super-Shear Rupture Imaging of the 2002 Mw 7.9 Denali Earthquake // Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. — 2022. — Vol. 127, no. 6. — e2022JB024359. — https://doi.org/10.1029/2022jb024359.
