1. Artemieva I. M., Thybo H. EUNAseis: A seismic model for Moho and crustal structure in Europe, Greenland, and the North Atlantic region // Tectonophysics. — 2013. — Vol. 609. — P. 97–153. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2013.08.004.
2. Artemieva I. M. Lithosphere structure in Europe from thermal isostasy // Earth-Science Reviews. — 2019. — Vol. 188. — P. 454–468. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.11.004.
3. Avrov V. Y., Buyalov N. I., Vasiliev V. G. Map of oil and gas potential of the USSR as of January 1 1967. — Moscow : Main Directorate of Geodesy, Cartography, 1969. — (In Russian).
4. Beardsmore G. R., Cull J. P. Crustal Heat Flow: A Guide to Measurement and Modelling. — Cambridge University Press, 2001. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511606021.
5. Bouman J., Floberghagen R., Rummel R. More Than 50 Years of Progress in Satellite Gravimetry // Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union. — 2013. — Vol. 94, no. 31. — P. 269–270. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/2013eo310001.
6. Bouman J., Ebbing J., Meekes S., et al. GOCE gravity gradient data for lithospheric modeling // International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation. — 2015. — Vol. 35. — P. 16–30. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2013.11.001.
7. Constantino R. R., Hackspacher P. C., Souza I. A. de, et al. Basement structures over Rio Grande Rise from gravity inversion // Journal of South American Earth Sciences. — 2017. — Vol. 75. — P. 85–91. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2017.02.005.
8. Förste C., König R., Bruinsma S., et al. On the principles of satellite-based Gravity Field Determination with special focus on the Satellite Laser Ranging technique // 20th International Workshop on Laser Ranging. — Potsdam : Helmholtz Centre, 2016.
9. Fowler C. M. R. The Solid Earth: An Introduction to Global Geophysics (2nd ed.) — Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2004.
10. Haas P., Ebbing J., Szwillus W. Sensitivity analysis of gravity gradient inversion of the Moho depth—a case example for the Amazonian Craton // Geophysical Journal International. — 2020. — Vol. 221, no. 3. — P. 1896–1912. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaa122.
11. Jennings S. S., Hasterok D., Lucazeau F. ThermoGlobe: Extending the global heat flow database // Journal TBD. — 2021.
12. Nabighian M. N., Ander M. E., Grauch V. J. S., et al. Historical development of the gravity method in exploration // Geophysics. — 2005. — Vol. 70, no. 6. — P. 63–89. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2133785.
13. Ognev I., Ebbing J., Haas P. Crustal structure of the Volgo-Uralian subcraton revealed by inverse and forward gravity modelling // Solid Earth. — 2022a. — Vol. 13, no. 2. — P. 431–448. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-431-2022.
14. Ognev I., Ebbing J., Lösing M., et al. The thermal state of Volgo–Uralia from Bayesian inversion of surface heat flow and temperature // Geophysical Journal International. — 2022b. — Vol. 232, no. 1. — P. 322–342. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggac338.
15. Paraskun V. I., Rozhetskiy B. Y. Database of Oil and gas fields of FSUE ”VNIGNI”. — Rosgeolfond, 2011. — (In Russian).
16. Sobh M., Ebbing J., Mansi A. H., et al. Inverse and 3D forward gravity modelling for the estimation of the crustal thickness of Egypt // Tectonophysics. — 2019. — Vol. 752. — P. 52–67. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2018.12.002.
17. Zheng W., Hsu H., Zhong M., et al. Requirements Analysis for Future Satellite Gravity Mission Improved-GRACE // Surveys in Geophysics. — 2014. — Vol. 36, no. 1. — P. 87–109. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-014-9306-y.