The Influence of Methane-Hydrogen Mixture on the Transformation of the Porous Space of Arenite Limestones
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
As part of the study of the possibilities of using carbonate reservoirs for intra-reservoir generation of hydrogen and its subsequent storage, including in conjunction with methane, it is necessary to evaluate its interaction with host rocks. The actual experience of storing methane-hydrogen mixtures (MHM) in geological structures is limited. The growing trend in research on this topic has been noticeable in recent years. An increase in the hydrogen content in the geological environment can lead to the development of a number of negative and poorly understood processes, including diffusion losses and geochemical processes, changes in the ratios of the components of gas mixtures, and the development of corrosive effects. This article presents the first results of experimental studies of the transformation of the pore space of carbonate rocks (arenite limestones) when aged in a methane-hydrogen mixture under specified reservoir conditions typical of underground gas storage facilities. Static tests were carried out on arenite limestone samples at a constant pressure of 8 MPa at a temperature of 24 ∘C. The methods of computed tomography (CT), infrared spectroscopy (IR) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) were used to control changes in the test system. The entire range of analytical work was carried out for the samples before and after the experiment. The results showed that the overall and effective porosities remained stable, possibly due to the fact that hydrogen did not significantly affect the filtration and capacitance properties. An important result was the assessment of the porosity of clays, its value increased by 2 times after exposure to MHM. Based on the results of the conducted research, the necessity of monitoring the condition of the overlapping clay strata and its integrity is substantiated. The experimental approach described above can be used in commercial oil and gas practice.

Keywords:
hydrogen-methane mixtures, limestone, pores, porosity, in-situ generation, underground storage
Text
Text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Abukova L. A., Volozh Yu. A., Filippova D. S., et al. The Search for Natural Hydrogen in Russia: State of the Problem and Possible Starting Solutions // Doklady Earth Sciences. — 2024. — Vol. 519, no. 2. — P. 2063–2071. — https://doi.org/10.1134/s1028334x24604012.

2. Aksyutin O. E., Ishkov A. G., Romanov K. V., et al. Methane-hydrogen energy for low-emission development // Gazovaya Promyshlennost. — 2018. — 11(777). — P. 120–125. — (In Russian).

3. Aluah R., Fadairo A. and Foerster I. Geochemical Stability of Carbonate Reservoirs for Safe and Efficient Underground Hydrogen Storage: A Case Study in North Dakota’s Red River Formation // SPE International Conference on Oilfield Chemistry. — Galveston, Texas, USA : SPE, 2025. — https://doi.org/10.2118/224313-MS.

4. Dmitrievsky A. N. Selected Works. Vol. 1: System Approach in Geology: Theoretical and Applied Aspects. — Nauka, 2008. — 454 p. — EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YNJXLF ; (in Russian).

5. Dzhafarov I. S., Syngaevsky P. E. and Khafizov S. F. Application of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Method for Characterizing Composition and Distribution of Reservoir Fluids. — Moscow : Khimiya, 2002. — 439 p. — (In Russian).

6. Galvis-Silva H. and Okoroafor E. R. Evaluating Carbonate Reservoir Rocks for Underground Hydrogen Storage: A Comprehensive Laboratory Approach // SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. — SPE, 2024. — https://doi.org/10.2118/220971-ms.

7. Hallenbeck P. C. and Benemann J. R. Biological hydrogen production; fundamentals and limiting processes // International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. — 2002. — Vol. 27, no. 11/12. — P. 1185–1193. — https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3199(02)00131-3.

8. Khanipova L. R. and Gutorov Yu. A. On Perspectives of Nuklear Magnetic for Evaluation of Reservoir Properties in Complex Reservoirs in OAO "Gazpromneft-NNG" // Neftegazovoe Delo. — 2012. — Vol. 10, no. 3. — P. 24–30. — EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UNNKDP ; (in Russian).

9. Methodological Recommendations for Calculating Geological Reserves of Oil and Gas by Volumetric Method / ed. by V. I. Petersile, V. I. Poroskurin and G. G. Yatsenko. — Moscow-Tver : NPC Tvergeofizika, 2003. — 258 p. — (In Russian).

10. Moghaddam A. L., Hejazi S., Fattahi M., et al. Methane pyrolysis for hydrogen production: navigating the path to a net zero future // Energy & Environmental Science. — 2025. — Vol. 18, no. 6. — P. 2747–2790. — https://doi.org/10.1039/D4EE06191H.

11. Raza A., Arif M., Glatz G., et al. A holistic overview of underground hydrogen storage: Influencing factors, current understanding, and outlook // Fuel. — 2022. — Vol. 330. — P. 125636. — https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125636.

12. Surguchev L., Berenblum R. and Dmitrievsky A. Method for producing hydrogen. Patent 021444 B1. — Eurasian Patent Office, 2015. — (In Russian).

13. Terabe K. and Shimokawa S. Application of NMR log for the low permeability limestone reservoir with fractures // Journal of the Japanese Association for Petroleum Technology. — 2012. — Vol. 77, no. 1. — P. 61–71. — https://doi.org/10.3720/japt.77.61.

14. Udvardi B., Kovács I. J., Kónya P., et al. Application of attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy in the mineralogical study of a landslide area, Hungary // Sedimentary Geology. — 2014. — Vol. 313. — P. 1–14. — https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2014.08.005.

15. Al-Yaseri A., Al-Mukainah H., Yekeen N., et al. Experimental investigation of hydrogen-carbonate reactions via computerized tomography: Implications for underground hydrogen storage // International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. — 2023. — Vol. 48, no. 9. — P. 3583–3592. — https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.10.148.


Login or Create
* Forgot password?