CRUSTAL SHORTENING DURING MOUNTAIN BUILDING: A CASE STUDY IN THE PAMIR-TIEN SHAN AND ALTAY-MONGOLIA REGION
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
Unravelling the underlying causes of mountain building is one pivotal issue of geotectonics. The most popular model invokes crustal thickening through horizontal, across mountain ranges, contraction of the area occupied by a mountainous country with its ensuing isostatic uplift. Another model calls for crustal underplating due to either underthrusting or to melts derived from mantle plumes, also resulting, through isostatic mechanisms, in mountain building. The objective of this paper is to establish relations between these two likely processes using case studies from the Pamir-Tien Shan region, as well as Altay and Mongolia. In tackling this problem, two methods are employed to define the amount of crustal shortening. Method 1 draws on crustal thickness as a starting value, and shortening is calculated as a function of its increase relative to the initial "cratonic'' thickness. In contrast to well-known approaches, geometric characteristics of magnitudes of neotectonic movements used in this algorithm enable one to establish the direction of maximum shortening and the relation between maximum and minimum shortenings. A data base on Moho depths and neotectonic movement magnitudes from Tien Shan was used. The N-S crustal shortening was found to be between 12% and 25% for Tien Shan. Method 2 is a modification of routine calculations based on folding and faulting deformations of peneplanation surfaces. Shortening values thus obtained were 4-12% on average for Tien Shan, 35% to 60% for the Afghan-Tajik basin, and less than 1% for Pamir, whereas Altay, Sayan, and Mongolia yielded both extension and shortening of 0.1% to 1.2%. Comparison of crustal shortening values obtained for Tien Shan by the two different methods shows a match of results obtained from maximum shortening directions and from spatial distribution of shortening maxima. A good correlation of these values was established, which is interpreted to show the model of crustal shortening and thickening Method1 to be in keeping with the natural process. Analyzing the regression of paired shortening values shows that lack of shortening from peneplanation surface deformations corresponds to a crustal thickening of 7km on average across Tien Shan. This is interpreted to suggest that, in Tien Shan, the two mountain building processes, horizontal shortening and crustal underplating, are in operation concomitantly. Therefore, one cause of mountain building in Tien Shan is pressure exerted by Pamir and Tarim and transmitted 300-400km northward from their boundary. In Mongolia, Sayan, and Altay alike, mountain building might be driven by the same causes related to rifting. Crustal shortening data rule out any impact from the Indian subcontinent pressing northward.

Keywords:
crustal shortening, rifting, plate tectonics, underplating.
Text
Publication text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Abdrakhmatov, Nature, v. 384, 1996., doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/384450a0

2. Argand, Proc. 13th Int. Geol. Congr., Brussels, 1, no. 5, 1924.

3. Avouac, Geophys. Res. Lett., v. 20, 1993.

4. Avouac, J. Geophys. Res., v. 98, 1993.

5. Bazhenov, Geotektonika, no. 3, 1988.

6. Bazhenov, Tectonophysics, v. 221, 1993., doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-19519390335-H

7. Bazhenov, J. Geodyn., v. 5, 1986., doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0264-37078690017-7

8. Bazhenov, Structural Arcs of the Alpine Belt: Carpathians-Caucases-Pamir, 1990.

9. Bazhenov, Geotektonika, no. 6, 1993.

10. Behrmann, Tectonophysics, v. 319, 2000., doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-19510000020-2

11. Bekker, Geotectonics, no. 1, 1996.

12. Belousov, Tectonophysics, no. 35, 1976.

13. Belsky, Neotectonics of the Junction Zone between Northern Pamir and Tajik Basin, 1978.

14. Bemmelen, Proc. 16th Intern. Geol. Congr., 1933.

15. Billings, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., v. 71, 1960., doi:https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606196071363:DAMB2.0.CO;2

16. Bobrov, Vychisl. Seismol., v. 31, 2000.

17. Bourgeois, J. Geophys. Res., v. 102, no. 27, 1997.

18. Burtman, Tr. Geol. Inst. Akad. Nauk SSSR, v. 104, 1964.

19. Burtman, Issues of Geodynamics of the Lithosphere, 1999.

20. Burtman, Tectonophysics, v. 319, 2000., doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-19510000022-6

21. Burtman, Geotektonika, no. 2, 1973.

22. Burtman, Geol. Soc. Am. Spec. Pap., v. 281, 1993.

23. Burtman, Geotectonics, no. 1, 1998.

24. Chediya, Morphostructures and Neotectonics of Tien Shan, 1986.

25. Chediya, The Neotectonic Stage of Geologic Evolution of the Territory of Tajikistan, 1962.

26. Chen, J. Geophys. Res., v. 12, no. 21, 1993.

27. Cobbold, Bull. Geol. Inst. Univ. Uppsala, N.S., v. 14, 1988.

28. Dercourt, Tectonophysics, v. 123, 1986.

29. Gibbs, Geodata, v. 1, 1990.

30. Goncharov, Mechanism of Geosynclinal Folding, 1988.

31. Grachev, Neotectonic map of northern Eurasia, scale 1:5,000,000, 1997.

32. Grachev, Fiz. Zemli, no. 10, 1999.

33. Grachev, Neotectonics, Geodynamics, and Seismicity of Northern Eurasia, 2000.

34. Gravity and Tectonics..., Gravity and Tectonics, 1976.

35. Guseva, Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Fiz. Zemli, no. 9, 1999.

36. Guseva, Geotektonika, no. 3, 1993.

37. Halim, J. Geophys. Res., v. 103, 1998., doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/98JB01118

38. Hossack, J. Geol. Soc. London, v. 136, 1979.

39. Kopp, Lateral Extrusion Structures in the Alpine-Himalayan Collisional Belt, 1997.

40. Korchemagin, M. V. Gzovsky and Developments in Tectonophysics, 2000.

41. Kulagina, Searching for Earthquake Forerunners in Prediction Proving Grounds, 1974.

42. Legler, Structure of Lithospheric Plates: Interaction of Plates and Formation of Crustal Structures, 1979.

43. Lukk, Geotektonika, no. 5, 1975.

44. Lukk, J. Geophys. Res., v. 100, no. 10, 1995., doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/95JB02158

45. Makarov, Tr. Geol. Inst. Akad. Nauk SSSR, v. 307, 1977.

46. Molnar, Science, v. 189, 1975., doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.189.4201.419

47. Pozzi, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., v. 103, 1991., doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X9190173-F

48. Prilepin, Fiz. Zemli, no. 6, 1997.

49. Ramberg, Gravity, deformation and the Earth's crust second edition, 1981.

50. Sadybakasov, Neotectonics of High Asia, 1990.

51. Scheidegger, Fundamentals of Geodynamics, 1987.

52. Shevchenko, Proc. Ninth Intern. Symp. On Recent Crustal Movements, 2000.

53. Sholpo, Alpine Geodynamics of the Greater Caucasus, 1978.

54. Shults, Analysis of the Neotectonics and Relief of Tien Shan, 1948.

55. Sobel, Lithos, v. 50, 2000., doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-49379900046-8

56. Solonenko, Earthquakes and Fundamentals of Seismic Zonation of Mongolia, 1985.

57. Stoecklin, Mesozoic-Cenozoic Orogenic Belts, edited by A. Spencer, 1974.

58. Thomas, J. Geophys. Res., v. 99, 1994., doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/94JB00901

59. Thomas, The Tectonic Evolution of Asia, edited by A. Yin and T. M. Harrison, 1996.

60. Trifonov, The Tectonic Evolution of the Earth's Crust and Faults, 1979.

61. Woodward, Short Course in Geology, v. 6, 1989.

62. Zakharov, Stratofabrics of Mesozoic and Cenozoic Deposits of the Tajik Basin, 1958.

63. Zakharov, Issues of Geology of Tajikistan, 1964.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?