1. Bird P. An updated digital model of plate boundaries // Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems. — 2003. — Vol. 4, no. 3. — P. 1027. — https://doi.org/10.1029/2001gc000252
2. Bukchin B. Determination of stress glut moments of total degree 2 from teleseismic surface wave amplitude spectra // Tectonophysics. — 1995. — Vol. 248, no. 3/4. — P. 185–191. — https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(94)00271-a
3. Bukchin B. G. Determination of source parameters from surface wave recording allowing for uncertainties in the properties of medium // Izvestiya of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR. Physics of the Solid Earth. — 1990. — Vol. 25. — P. 723–728.
4. Bukchin B. G. Second-moment approximation of the earthquake source and fault plane identification // Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth. — 2017. — Vol. 53, no. 2. — P. 243–249. — https://doi.org/10.1134/s1069351317020045
5. Bukchin B. G., Egorkin A. A. and Mostinskiy A. Z. Software complex FMT package. — 2005.
6. Bukchin B. G., Fomochkina A. S., Kossobokov V. G., et al. Characterizing the Foreshock, Main Shock, and Aftershock Sequences of the Recent Major Earthquakes in Southern Alaska, 2016-2018 // Frontiers in Earth Science. — 2020. — Vol. 8. — https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.584659
7. DeMets C., Gordon R. G., Argus D. F., et al. Current plate motions // Geophysical Journal International. — 1990. — Vol. 101, no. 2. — P. 425–478. — https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246x.1990.tb06579.x
8. Dziewonski A. M. and Anderson D. L. Preliminary reference Earth model // Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors. — 1981. — Vol. 25, no. 4. — P. 297–356. — https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9201(81)90046-7
9. Dziewonski A. M. and Woodhouse J. H. An experiment in systematic study of global seismicity: Centroid-moment tensor solutions for 201 moderate and large earthquakes of 1981 // Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. — 1983. — Vol. 88, B4. — P. 3247–3271. — https://doi.org/10.1029/jb088ib04p03247
10. Filippova A., Fomochkina A., Kossobokov V., et al. Characterizing the foreshock, main shock, and aftershock sequences of the recent major earthquakes in Southern Alaska, 2020-2024 // Frontiers in Earth Science. — 2025. — Vol. 13. — https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2025.1660221
11. Filippova A. I., Bukchin B. G., Fomochkina A. S., et al. Source process of the September 21, 2020 Mw 5.6 Bystraya earthquake at the South-Eastern segment of the Main Sayan fault (Eastern Siberia, Russia) // Tectonophysics. — 2022. — Vol. 822. — P. 229162. — https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2021.229162
12. Filippova A. I., Fomochkina A. S., Gileva N. A., et al. The September 6, 2021 MW 5.4 Tofalaria earthquake at a weakly active segment of the Main Sayan fault (Eastern Siberia) // Journal of Structural Geology. — 2024. — Vol. 188. — P. 105255. — https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2024.105255
13. Gorbatov A., Kostoglodov V., Suárez G., et al. Seismicity and structure of the Kamchatka Subduction Zone // Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. — 1997. — Vol. 102, B8. — P. 17883–17898. — https://doi.org/10.1029/96jb03491
14. Hanks T. and Kanamori H. A moment magnitude scale // Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. — 1979. — Vol. 84, B5. — P. 2348–2350. — https://doi.org/10.1029/jb084ib05p02348
15. Hayes G. P., Moore G. L., Portner D. E., et al. Slab2, a comprehensive subduction zone geometry model // Science. — 2018. — Vol. 362, no. 6410. — P. 58–61. — https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat4723
16. Hayes G. P., Rivera L. and Kanamori H. Source Inversion of the W-Phase: Real-time Implementation and Extension to Low Magnitudes // Seismological Research Letters. — 2009. — Vol. 80, no. 5. — P. 817–822. — https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.80.5.817
17. Heidbach O., Rajabi M., Reiter K., et al. World stress map 2016. — GFZ Data Service, 2016. — https://doi.org/10.5880/WSM.2016.002
18. Ji C., Wald D. J. and Helmberger D. V. Source Description of the 1999 Hector Mine, California, Earthquake, Part I: Wavelet Domain Inversion Theory and Resolution Analysis // Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. — 2002. — Vol. 92, no. 4. — P. 1192–1207. — https://doi.org/10.1785/0120000916
19. Johnson J. M. and Satake K. Asperity Distribution of the 1952 Great Kamchatka Earthquake and its Relation to Future Earthquake Potential in Kamchatka // Pure and Applied Geophysics. — 1999. — Vol. 154, no. 3/4. — P. 541–553. — https://doi.org/10.1007/s000240050243
20. Kagan Y. Y. 3-D rotation of double-couple earthquake sources // Geophysical Journal International. — 1991. — Vol. 106, no. 3. — P. 709–716. — https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1991.tb06343.x
21. Kagan Y. Y. Simplified algorithms for calculating double-couple rotation // Geophysical Journal International. — 2007. — Vol. 171, no. 1. — P. 411–418. — https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03538.x
22. Kanamori H. Re-examination of the earth’s free oxcillations excited by the Kamchatka earthquake of November 4, 1952 // Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors. — 1976. — Vol. 11, no. 3. — P. 216–226. — https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9201(76)90066-2
23. Kanamori H. and Rivera L. Source inversion of W phase: speeding up seismic tsunami warning // Geophysical Journal International. — 2008. — Vol. 175, no. 1. — P. 222–238. — https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246x.2008.03887.x
24. Keilis-Borok V. I. Recording, Identification, and Measurement of Surface Wave Parameters // Seismic Surface Waves in a Laterally Inhomogeneous Earth / ed. by V. I. Keilis-Borok. — 1989. — P. 131–182. — https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0883-3_5
25. Kogan M. G., Frolov D. I., Vasilenko N. F., et al. Plate coupling and strain in the far western Aleutian arc modeled from GPS data // Geophysical Research Letters. — 2017. — Vol. 44, no. 7. — P. 3176–3183. — https://doi.org/10.1002/2017gl072735
26. Lasserre C., Bukchin B., Bernard P., et al. Source parameters and tectonic origin of the 1996 June 1 Tianzhu (Mw=5.2) and 1995 July 21 Yongden (Mw=5.6) earthquakes near the Haiyuan fault (Gansu, China) // Geophysical Journal International. — 2001. — Vol. 144, no. 1. — P. 206–220. — https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246x.2001.00313.x
27. Leonard M. Earthquake Fault Scaling: Self-Consistent Relating of Rupture Length, Width, Average Displacement, and Moment Release // Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. — 2010. — Vol. 100, 5A. — P. 1971–1988. — https://doi.org/10.1785/0120090189
28. Melnikova V. I. Crustal strain parameters in the Baikal Rift Zone from seismic data : PhD thesis / Melnikova V. I. — Irkutsk, 2008. — (In Russian).
29. Mendiguren J. A. Inversion of surface wave data in source mechanism studies // Journal of Geophysical Research. — 1977. — Vol. 82, no. 5. — P. 889–894. — https://doi.org/10.1029/jb082i005p00889
30. Nataf H.-C. and Ricard Y. 3SMAC: an a priori tomographic model of the upper mantle based on geophysical modeling // Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors. — 1996. — Vol. 95, no. 1/2. — P. 101–122. — https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9201(95)03105-7
31. Nishizawa T., Nakamura H., Churikova T., et al. Genesis of ultra-high-Ni olivine in high-Mg andesite lava triggered by seamount subduction // Scientific Reports. — 2017. — Vol. 7, no. 1. — https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10276-3
32. Rösler B. and Stein S. Consistency of Non-Double-Couple Components of Seismic Moment Tensors with Earthquake Magnitude and Mechanism // Seismological Research Letters. — 2022. — Vol. 93, no. 3. — P. 1510–1523. — https://doi.org/10.1785/0220210188
33. Ruppert N. A., Lees J. M. and Kozyreva N. P. Seismicity, earthquakes and structure along the Alaska-Aleutian and Kamchatka-Kurile Subduction Zones: A review // Volcanism and Subduction: The Kamchatka Region. — American Geophysical Union, 2007. — P. 129–144. — https://doi.org/10.1029/172gm12
34. Seredkina A. I., Melnikova V. I., Radziminovich Y. B., et al. Seismicity of the Erguna Region (Northeastern China): Evidence for Local Stress Redistribution // Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. — 2020. — Vol. 110, no. 2. — P. 803–815. — https://doi.org/10.1785/0120190182
35. Sipkin S. Estimation of earthquake source parameters by the inversion of waveform data: synthetic waveforms // Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors. — 1982. — Vol. 30, no. 2/3. — P. 242–259. — https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9201(82)90111-x
36. Thingbaijam K. K. S., Martin Mai P. and Goda K. New Empirical Earthquake Source-Scaling Laws // Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. — 2017. — Vol. 107, no. 5. — P. 2225–2246. — https://doi.org/10.1785/0120170017
37. Wells D. L. and Coppersmith K. J. New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement // Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. — 1994. — Vol. 84, no. 4. — P. 974–1002. — https://doi.org/10.1785/bssa0840040974
38. Xu D., Wang W. and Ren Z. Preliminary slip distribution of the July 29, 2025 M 8.8 Kamchatka, Russia earthquake // Earthquake Research Advances. — 2025. — P. 100427. — https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eqrea.2025.100427
39. Zaccagnino D. and Doglioni C. The impact of faulting complexity and type on earthquake rupture dynamics // Communications Earth & Environment. — 2022. — Vol. 3, no. 1. — https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00593-5
40. Zavyalov A. D. and Zotov O. D. A New Way to Determine the Characteristic Size of the Source Zone // Journal of Volcanology and Seismology. — 2021. — Vol. 15, no. 1. — P. 19–25. — https://doi.org/10.1134/s0742046321010139