Moment Magnitude Estimation of the July 29, 2025, Kamchatka Earthquake Based on Accelerometers Data
Аннотация и ключевые слова
Аннотация:
On July 29, 2025, a major earthquake with a moment magnitude of MW = 8.8 occurred off the coast of Kamchatka. The most accurate and rapid estimation of the magnitude of such events is a crucial task in modern seismology, particularly in the context of earthquake and tsunami early warning systems. In this study, we propose and test an approach for rapid MW estimation from accelerometer records based on an empirical relationship between peak ground displacement (PGD) and moment magnitude. Unlike most similar studies, we rely exclusively on accelerometric data from 13 seismic stations on Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands, without the use of GNSS observations. The final MW estimate derived from all stations was 8.75 ± 0.2, which is consistent with values reported by international agencies. Simulating real-time data processing demonstrated that a first stable magnitude estimate of MW = 7.6 ± 1.3 could be obtained as early as 4.5 minutes after the earthquake origin time, with a value of MW = 8.65 ± 0.3 available after 8 minutes. The results indicate that, given an existing accelerometer network, this methodology can provide reliable and sufficiently rapid estimates of the moment magnitude of major earthquakes without the need for GNSS data. This opens possibilities for enhancing the timeliness of source parameter estimation and for improving tsunami early warning systems in regions with developed seismic infrastructure, without requiring major modifications to existing seismic data processing systems.

Ключевые слова:
Accelerograms, peak ground displacement, accelerometer network, warning system, great earthquakes, Kamchatka megathrust earthquake
Список литературы

1. Allen R. M., Gasparini P., Kamigaichi O., et al. The status of earthquake early warning around the world: An introductory overview // Seismological Research Letters. — 2009. — Vol. 80, no. 5. — P. 682–693. — https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.80.5.682

2. Blewitt G., Hammond W. C., Kreemer C., et al. GPS for real-time earthquake source determination and tsunami warning systems // Journal of Geodesy. — 2009. — Vol. 83, no. 3/4. — P. 335–343. — https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-008-0262-5

3. Crowell B. W., Melgar D., Bock Y., et al. Earthquake magnitude scaling using seismogeodetic data // Geophysical Research Letters. — 2013. — Vol. 40, no. 23. — P. 6089–6094. — https://doi.org/10.1002/2013gl058391

4. Crowell B. W., Melgar D. and Geng J. Hypothetical real-time GNSS modeling of the 2016 Mw 7.8 Kaikoura earthquake: ¯ Perspectives from ground motion and tsunami inundation prediction // Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. — 2018. — Vol. 108, 3B. — P. 1736–1745. — https://doi.org/10.1785/0120170247

5. Hoshiba M. and Iwakiri K. Initial 30 seconds of the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake (M w 9.0)-amplitude and τ c for magnitude estimation for Earthquake Early Warning- // Earth, Planets and Space. — 2011. — Vol. 63, no. 7. — P. 553–557. — https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2011.06.015

6. Hoshiba M. and Ozaki T. Earthquake early warning and tsunami warning of the Japan Meteorological Agency, and their performance in the 2011 off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake (Mw 9.0) // Early Warning for Geological Disasters. — Berlin : Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014. — P. 1–28. — https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12233-0_1

7. Kostylev D. V. Formation of a unified system for collecting seismological information in the Sakhalin Division GS RAS // Russian Journal of Seismology. — 2021. — Vol. 3, no. 1. — P. 41–53. — https://doi.org/10.35540/2686-7907.2021.1.03 — (In Russian).

8. Melgar D., Bock Y., Sanchez D., et al. On robust and reliable automated baseline corrections for strong motion seismology // Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. — 2013. — Vol. 118, no. 3. — P. 1177–1187. — https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrb.50135

9. Melgar D., Crowell B. W., Geng J., et al. Earthquake magnitude calculation without saturation from the scaling of peak ground displacement // Geophysical Research Letters. — 2015. — Vol. 42, no. 13. — P. 5197–5205. — https://doi.org/10.1002/2015gl064278

10. Murray J. R., Crowell B. W., Murray M. H., et al. Incorporation of real-time earthquake magnitudes estimated via peak ground displacement scaling in the ShakeAlert earthquake Early Warning System // Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. — 2023. — Vol. 113, no. 3. — P. 1286–1310. — https://doi.org/10.1785/0120220181

11. Ohta Y., Inoue T., Koshimura S., et al. Role of Real-Time GNSS in Near-Field Tsunami Forecasting // Journal of Disaster Research. — 2018. — Vol. 13, no. 3. — P. 453–459. — https://doi.org/10.20965/jdr.2018.p0453

12. Ruhl C., Melgar D., Geng J., et al. A Global Database of Strong-Motion Displacement GNSS Recordings and an Example Application to PGD Scaling // Seismological Research Letters. — 2018. — Vol. 90, no. 1. — P. 271–279. — https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180177

13. Shu Y., Fang R., Geng J., et al. Broadband Velocities and Displacements From Integrated GPS and Accelerometer Data for High-Rate Seismogeodesy // Geophysical Research Letters. — 2018. — Vol. 45, no. 17. — P. 8939–8948. — https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL079425

14. Wright T. J., Houlié N., Hildyard M., et al. Real-time, reliable magnitudes for large earthquakes from 1 Hz GPS precise point positioning: The 2011 Tohoku-Oki (Japan) earthquake // Geophysical Research Letters. — 2012. — Vol. 39, no. 12. — https://doi.org/10.1029/2012gl051894

15. Xin S., Geng J., Zeng R., et al. In-situ real-time seismogeodesy by integrating multi-GNSS and accelerometers // Measurement. — 2021. — Vol. 179. — P. 109453. — https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109453


Войти или Создать
* Забыли пароль?