аспирант с 01.01.2022 по 01.01.2025
Россия
сотрудник с 01.01.2017 по 01.01.2025
Россия
сотрудник с 01.01.2011 по 01.01.2025
Россия
ВАК 1.6.11 Геология, поиски, разведка и эксплуатация нефтяных и газовых месторождений
УДК 55 Геология. Геологические и геофизические науки
УДК 550.34 Сейсмология
УДК 550.383 Главное магнитное поле Земли
ГРНТИ 37.01 Общие вопросы геофизики
ГРНТИ 37.15 Геомагнетизм и высокие слои атмосферы
ГРНТИ 37.25 Океанология
ГРНТИ 37.31 Физика Земли
ГРНТИ 38.01 Общие вопросы геологии
ГРНТИ 36.00 ГЕОДЕЗИЯ. КАРТОГРАФИЯ
ГРНТИ 37.00 ГЕОФИЗИКА
ГРНТИ 38.00 ГЕОЛОГИЯ
ГРНТИ 39.00 ГЕОГРАФИЯ
ГРНТИ 52.00 ГОРНОЕ ДЕЛО
ОКСО 05.00.00 Науки о Земле
ББК 26 Науки о Земле
ТБК 63 Науки о Земле. Экология
BISAC SCI SCIENCE
The East European Platform is one of the most extensively studied regions of Russia in terms of geological exploration. However, certain areas remain relatively underexplored from a geological and geophysical perspective. One such region in the European part of Russia is the Mezen syneclise and the adjacent shelf of the White Sea. This area is characterized by complex and poorly studied geological structures. No hydrocarbon inflows have been obtained from the sedimentary cover deposits of the Mezen syneclise. The oil and gas potential of the region can only be inferred from hydrocarbon shows and elevated hydrocarbon concentrations detected in the underground waters of the Riphean and Vendian formations during drilling. Based on a conceptual geological model and an evolutionary-genetic analysis of the region’s development, an assessment of the specific resource density of the Precambrian section of the sedimentary cover was conducted. A key factor that influenced the region’s hydrocarbon potential was the Vendian collision of the East European Craton with the Pechora Plate. The prospects for discovering oil and gas accumulations are associated with the platform slopes of the most subsided structures, including the Safonovsky, East Safonovsky, and Leshukonsky depressions. The primary exploration targets are structural-lithological hydrocarbon traps located along these slopes, which have been minimally affected by tectonic transformations and may have preserved their hydrocarbon potential.
Riphean and Vendian sediments, Mezen-Belomor tectonic-sedimentary element, oil and gas content forecast, hydrocarbon resources, marginal systems
1. Aplonov S. V., Burzin M. B., Veis A. F., et al. Geodynamics and possible oil and gas potential of the Mezen sedimentary basin. — Saint Petersburg : Nauka, 2006. — 319 p. — (In Russian).
2. Areshev E. G., Gavrilov V. P., Dong Ch. L., et al. Geology and oil and gas potential of the basement of the Sunda shelf. — Neft’ i gaz, 1998. — (In Russian).
3. Asming V. E., Afonin N. Yu., Bakunovich L. I., et al. Lithospheric Structure and Dynamics of the White Sea Region. — Petrozavodsk : Karelian Research Centre of RAS, 2022. — 242 p. — (In Russian).
4. Babyr N. V., Gabov V. V., Nosov A. A., et al. Features of design and work method of mining module at coal deposits in the Russian Arctic // Mining informational and analytical bulletin. — 2024. — Vol. 6, no. 6. — P. 5–16. — https://doi.org/10.25018/0236_1493_2024_6_0_5. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TPKRTO
5. Baluev A. S. Continental rifting of the north of the East European Platform in the Neogene: geology, development history, comparative analysis: PhD Dissertation. — Geological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2013. — (In Russian). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SUNEXB
6. Baluev A. S., Brusilovskiy Yu. V. and Ivanenko A. N. The crustal structure of Onega-Kandalaksha paleorift identified by complex analysis of the anomalous magnetic field of the White Sea // Geodynamics & Tectonophysics. — 2018. — Vol. 9, no. 4. — P. 1293–1312. — https://doi.org/10.5800/gt-2018-9-4-0396. — (In Russian).
7. Baluev A. S., Zhuravlev V. A. and Przhiyalgovskii E. S. New data on the structure of the central part of the White Sea paleorift system // Doklady Earth Sciences. — 2009. — Vol. 427, no. 2. — P. 891–896. — https://doi.org/10.1134/s1028334x09060014. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/MWXIHR
8. Baluev A. S., Zhuravlev V. A., Terekhov E. N., et al. Tectonics of the White Sea and Adjacent Areas (The Explanatory Notes to "The Tectonic Map of the White Sea And Adjacent Areas", at a scale of 1:1,500,000) // Proceedings of the Geological Institute. — 2012. — No. 597. — P. 1–104. — EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XYGTVJ ; (in Russian).
9. Bazhenova T. K. Problem of petroleum potential of basal horizons in the basins of ancient platforms in aspect of their katagenetic evolution // Neftegazovaya Geologiya. Teoriya I Praktika. — 2008. — Vol. 3, no. 3. — EDN: https://elibrary.ru/JUTGZF ; (in Russian).
10. Botalov A. N. and Alekseeva O. L. Modeling the Formation Processes of the Oil and Gas Potential of the Vychegda Trough // Bulletin of Perm University. Geology. — 2021. — Vol. 20, no. 4. — P. 379–395. — https://doi.org/10.17072/psu.geol.20.4.379. — (In Russian). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/GVORBM
11. Brusilovskiy Yu. V. and Bush V. A. A Model of the Magnetically Active Layer of Western Mezen Syneclise // Geophysical Research. — 2015. — Vol. 16, no. 1. — P. 69–76. — EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TMGFQV ; (in Russian).
12. Bulin I. K., Shcheglov A. D., Egorkin A. V., et al. New seismic markers of the lithosphere in areas of large hydrocarbon accumulations // Doklady Earth Sciences. — 1999. — Vol. 364, no. 6. — P. 792–795. — (In Russian).
13. Chebanenko I. I., Krayushkin V. A., Klochko V. P., et al. Oil and gas in the Precambrian of the Dnieper-Donets aulacogen // Russian Oil and Gas Geology. — 2004. — No. 2. — P. 27–37. — EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PJUTVF ; (in Russian).
14. Dorhjie D. B., Mukhina E., Kasyanenko A., et al. Tight and Shale Oil Exploration: A Review of the Global Experience and a Case of West Siberia // Energies. — 2023. — Vol. 16, no. 18. — P. 6475. — https://doi.org/10.3390/en16186475. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZMDYZC
15. Dovgan I. A., Martynov A. V. and Grokhotov E. I. Oil and gas reservoirs in clinoforms of the Kolgan strata in the Volga-Ural oil and gas province: Forecast and survey technologies // Gornyi Zhurnal. — 2024. — No. 9. — P. 4–11. — https://doi.org/10.17580/gzh.2024.09.01. — (In Russian). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/NXCRKD
16. Dvoynikov M. V., Sidorkin D. I., Yurtaev S. L., et al. Drilling of deep and ultra-deep wells for prospecting and exploration of new raw mineral fields // Journal of Mining Institute. — 2022. — Vol. 258. — P. 945–955. — https://doi.org/10.31897/PMI.2022.55. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ILKZPC
17. Egorov A. S., Prischepa O. M., Nefedov Y. V., et al. Deep Structure, Tectonics and Petroleum Potential of the Western Sector of the Russian Arctic // Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. — 2021. — Vol. 9, no. 3. — P. 258. — https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9030258. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZRHHUV
18. Frolov S. V., Akhmanov G. G., Kozlova E. V., et al. Riphean basins of the central and western Siberian Platform // Marine and Petroleum Geology. — 2011. — Vol. 28, no. 4. — P. 906–920. — https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2010.01.023. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/OHQZJN
19. Gatiyatullin N. S. Geology and oil and gas potential of Precambrian complexes of the East European Platform: PhD Dissertation. — All-Russian Petroleum Research Geological Institute, 2004. — (In Russian). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/NHQALR
20. Gavrilov V. P., Dvoretsky P. I., Dunaev V. F., et al. Geology and oil and gas potential of the Moscow and Mezen syneclises. — Gazprom, 2000. — 157 p. — (In Russian).
21. Gavrilov V. P., Rudnev A. N., Dvoretsky P. I., et al. Prospects for oil and gas potential of the Mezen syneclise // Geology of Oil and Gas. — 1998. — No. 5. — P. 12–20. — (In Russian).
22. Golubev V. A., Verbnikova V. A., Lopyrev I. A., et al. Energy Evolution: Forecasting the Development of Non-Conventional Renewable Energy Sources and Their Impact on the Conventional Electricity System // Sustainability. — 2021. — Vol. 13, no. 22. — P. 12919. — https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212919. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/EPMNEB
23. Gusev E. A. Results and prospects of geological mapping of the Arctic shelf of Russia // Journal of Mining Institute. — 2022. — Vol. 255. — P. 290–298. — https://doi.org/10.31897/PMI.2022.50. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BGPLUQ
24. Kelly A. E., Love G. D., Zumberge J. E., et al. Hydrocarbon biomarkers of Neoproterozoic to Lower Cambrian oils from eastern Siberia // Organic Geochemistry. — 2011. — Vol. 42, no. 6. — P. 640–654. — https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2011.03.028. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/OKNNCR
25. Khalimov Yu. E. Petroleum Potential of Granitoid Basement Reservoirs // Neftegazovaya Geologiya. Teoriya I Praktika. — 2012. — Vol. 7, no. 4. — P. 1–14. — EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PLHDKX ; (in Russian).
26. Kirsanova N., Nevskaya M. and Raikhlin S. Sustainable Development of Mining Regions in the Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation // Sustainability. — 2024. — Vol. 16, no. 5. — P. 2060. — https://doi.org/10.3390/su16052060. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/DQPJCT
27. Malov A. I. Primary Composition of Vendian Rocks of the Mezen Syneclise // Doklady Earth Sciences. — 2003. — Vol. 392, no. 7. — P. 968–972. — EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KERPLJ.
28. Malov A. I. Water-Rock Interaction in Vendian Sandy-Clayey Rocks of the Mezen Syneclise // Lithology and Mineral Resources. — 2004. — Vol. 39, no. 4. — P. 345–356. — https://doi.org/10.1023/b:limi.0000033821.50195.ef. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LIPEDN
29. Malozyomov B. V., Martyushev N. V., Babyr N. V., et al. Modelling of Reliability Indicators of a Mining Plant // Mathematics. — 2024. — Vol. 12, no. 18. — P. 2842. — https://doi.org/10.3390/math12182842. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YBQASK
30. Melnikov N. V., Melnikov P. N. and Smirnov E. V. The petroleum accumulation zones in the geological-prospecting regions of the Lena-Tunguska province // Russian Geology and Geophysics. — 2011. — Vol. 52, no. 8. — P. 906–916. — https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rgg.2011.07.012. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/OHZNLT
31. Meyer H. J. and McGee H. W. Oil and gas fields accompanied by geothermal anomalies in Rocky Mountain region // AAPG Bulletin. — 1985. — Vol. 69, no. 6. — P. 933–945. — https://doi.org/10.1306/AD462B28-16F7-11D7-8645000102C1865D.
32. Mingaleva T., Gorelik G., Egorov A., et al. Correction of Depth-Velocity Models by Gravity Prospecting for Hard-to-Reach Areas of the Shelf Zone // Mining informational and analytical bulletin. — 2022. — No. 10/1. — P. 77–86. — https://doi.org/10.25018/0236_1493_2022_101_0_77. — (In Russian).
33. Nefedov Yu. V., Vostrikov N. N., Gribanov M. A., et al. Recent trends in oil and gas geology software modeling // Gornyi Zhurnal. — 2024. — No. 9. — P. 27–33. — https://doi.org/10.17580/gzh.2024.09.04. — (In Russian). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/JOBNSO
34. Olneva T. V., Egorov A. S. and Oreshkova M. Yu. Improvement of seismic image in interpretation stage for the purposes of seismic facies analysis // Oil and gas geology. — 2024. — No. 6. — P. 81–95. — https://doi.org/10.47148/0016-7894-2023-6-81-95. — (In Russian).
35. Peskov D. V., Prishchepa O. M. and Zharkov A. M. Oil and gas potential of ancient Riphean sediments of the East European Platform (Mezen syneclise) based on basin analysis // Gornyi Zhurnal. — 2024. — No. 9. — P. 12–19. — https://doi.org/10.17580/gzh.2024.09.02. — (In Russian). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HXPNYY
36. Pimenov B. A. Geological structure and oil and gas potential of the Mezen syneclise: Abstract of dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Geological and Mineralogical Sciences. — Syktyvkar : Institute of Geology of the Komi Scientific Center of the UB RAS, 1994. — 18 p. — (In Russian). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZLHVPP
37. Prischepa O., Nefedov Y. and Nikiforova V. Arctic Shelf Oil and Gas Prospects from Lower-Middle Paleozoic Sediments of the Timan-Pechora Oil and Gas Province Based on the Results of a Regional Study // Resources. — 2021. — Vol. 11, no. 1. — P. 3. — https://doi.org/10.3390/resources11010003. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QAVLMD
38. Prischepa O. M., Kireev S. B., Nefedov Y. V., et al. Theoretical and methodological approaches to identifying deep accumulations of oil and gas in oil and gas basins of the Russian Federation // Frontiers in Earth Science. — 2023. — Vol. 11. — https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2023.1192051. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/DMQMPI
39. Prischepa O. M. and Sinitsa N. V. Prospects for Oil and Gas Bearing Potential of Paleozoic Basement of West Siberian Sedimentary Basin // International Journal of Engineering. — 2025. — Vol. 38, no. 5. — P. 1098–1107. — https://doi.org/10.5829/ije.2025.38.05b.12. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/MHTRCL
40. Prischepa O. M. and Xu R. Criteria for Oil and Gas Bearing Potential of Jurassic Continental Sediments of the Central Part of Junggarian Sedimentary Basin // International Journal of Engineering. — 2025. — Vol. 38, no. 1. — P. 223–235. — https://doi.org/10.5829/ije.2025.38.01a.20. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/EZHQOP
41. Prishchepa O. M., Sinitsa N. V. and Ibatullin A. Kh. Assessment of the influence of lithological and facies conditions on the distribution of organic carbon in the "Domanik" Upper Devonian sediments of the Timan-Pechora province // Journal of Mining Institute. — 2024. — Vol. 268. — P. 535–551. — EDN: https://elibrary.ru/JPUKCM ; (in Russian).
42. Putikov O., Kholmyanski M., Ivanov G., et al. Application of geoelectrochemical method for exploration of petroleum fields on the Arctic shelf // Geochemistry. — 2020. — Vol. 80, no. 3. — https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoch.2019.02.001. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SANEYH
43. Romasheva N. and Dmitrieva D. Energy Resources Exploitation in the Russian Arctic: Challenges and Prospects for the Sustainable Development of the Ecosystem // Energies. — 2021. — Vol. 14, no. 24. — https://doi.org/10.3390/en14248300. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WVMHIO
44. Serikova U. S. and Allanazarova M. A. Oil and gas prospects in deep deposits of the South Caspian water area // Proceedings of higher educational establishments. Geology and Exploration. — 2023. — No. 2. — P. 33–46. — https://doi.org/10.32454/0016-7762-2023-65-2-33-46. — (In Russian). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SRBPWN
45. Sharov N. V., Bakunovich L. I., Belashev B. Z., et al. Geological-geophysical models of the crust for the White Sea region // Geodynamics & Tectonophysics. — 2020. — Vol. 11, no. 3. — P. 566–582. — https://doi.org/10.5800/gt-2020-11-3-0491. — (In Russian).
46. Shilovskaya T. I. and Shilovskiy A. P. Features of the structure of the sedimentary strata section of the Mezen syneclise in connection with the prospects for oil and gas potential // Geology, Geophysics and Development of Oil and Gas Fields. — 2007. — No. 6. — P. 4–9. — EDN: https://elibrary.ru/IABTND ; (in Russian).
47. Shnip O. A. Geological criteria for assessing the prospects of basement rocks for oil and gas // Russian Oil and Gas Geology. — 2000. — No. 5. — P. 21–26. — EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WKNTCQ ; (in Russian).
48. Sitar K. A., Georgievskiy B. V., Bolshakova M. A., et al. Comprehensive evaluation of Neoproterozoic source rocks formation // Georesursy. — 2022. — Vol. 24, no. 2. — P. 47–59. — https://doi.org/10.18599/grs.2022.2.8. — (In Russian). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PNEPRE
49. Tsyganov V. A. New data on the geological structure of the Mezen syneclise territory and its prospects for hydrocarbons (based on high-precision aeromagnetic survey results) // Georesources. — 2006. — 1(18). — P. 2–8. — EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KTYGPZ ; (in Russian).
50. Yakovleva A. A., Movchan I. B., Medinskaia D. K., et al. Quantitative interpretations of potential fields: from parametric to geostructural recalculations // Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University Geo Assets Engineering. — 2023. — Vol. 334, no. 11. — P. 198–215. — https://doi.org/10.18799/24131830/2023/11/4152. — (In Russian). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZBBWEG
51. Yan Q., Han Z. and Wang S. Geochemical Characteristics of Mercury in Oil and Gas // IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. — 2017. — Vol. 63, no. 1. — P. 012024. — https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/63/1/012024.
52. Zhang Y., Wang W., Li L., et al. Influence of the Moho surface distribution on the oil and gas basins in China seas and adjacent areas // Acta Oceanologica Sinica. — 2023. — Vol. 42, no. 3. — P. 167–188. — https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-022-2136-8. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KOXWVI
53. Zharkov A. M. Geological structure and forecast of hydrocarbon accumulation distribution in Achimov formation of Western Siberia // Neftegazovaya Geologiya. Teoriya I Praktika. — 2016. — Vol. 11, no. 4. — P. 51. — https://doi.org/10.17353/2070-5379/51_2016. — (In Russian). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XHYSMF
54. Zharkov A. M., Peskov D. V. and Martynov A. V. Marginal systems of ancient platforms - the main centers of hydrocarbon generation // Neftegazovaya Geologiya. Teoriya I Praktika. — 2024. — Vol. 19, no. 3. — EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ADAELM ; (in Russian).
55. Zhukovskiy Y., Tsvetkov P., Koshenkova A., et al. A Methodology for Forecasting the KPIs of a Region’s Development: Case of the Russian Arctic // Sustainability. — 2024. — Vol. 16, no. 15. — P. 6597. — https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156597. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/JFFLHU
56. Zhuravlev V. A., Kuprin V. F., Lukyanova L. I., et al. State geological map of the Russian Federation. Scale 1:1,000,000 (third generation). Mezen series. Sheet Q-38 - Mezen. Explanatory note. — VSEGEI, 2012. — 311 p. — (In Russian).
