Россия
Россия
Россия
Россия
Россия
ФГБУ "Всероссийский научно-исследовательский институт по проблемам гражданской обороны и чрезвычайных ситуаций МЧС России" (федеральный центр науки и высоких технологий)
Россия
УДК 00 Наука в целом (информационные технологии - 004)
УДК 9 География. Биография. История
УДК 55 Геология. Геологические и геофизические науки
УДК 550.34 Сейсмология
УДК 550.383 Главное магнитное поле Земли
ГРНТИ 37.01 Общие вопросы геофизики
ГРНТИ 37.15 Геомагнетизм и высокие слои атмосферы
ГРНТИ 37.25 Океанология
ГРНТИ 37.31 Физика Земли
ГРНТИ 38.01 Общие вопросы геологии
ГРНТИ 36.00 ГЕОДЕЗИЯ. КАРТОГРАФИЯ
ГРНТИ 37.00 ГЕОФИЗИКА
ГРНТИ 38.00 ГЕОЛОГИЯ
ГРНТИ 39.00 ГЕОГРАФИЯ
ГРНТИ 52.00 ГОРНОЕ ДЕЛО
ОКСО 05.00.00 Науки о Земле
ББК 26 Науки о Земле
ТБК 63 Науки о Земле. Экология
BISAC SCI SCIENCE
The study describes the use of the Extremum system for simulating near-real-time effects related to the devastating earthquake that struck Morocco on September 8, 2023, as well as the consequences of several scenario events for potentially hazardous source zones in the High Atlas (HA) region. The study’s relevance stems from the need for accurate estimates of potential losses resulting from recent earthquakes to support response decision-making and potential scenario events in the most hazardous zones, as well as to create and conduct early action plans to reduce seismic risk. The calibration of the seismic intensity attenuation models for the Moroccan area using the Extremum system is the aim of this work, too, to investigate the applicability of seismic intensity attenuation equations previously established, for near-real-time loss assessment for strong events and scenario events that could occur in the study area. It is worth pointing out that our work is the first to analyze these equations. We also look into the impact of regional vulnerability functions on typical building stock and earthquake loss simulation outcomes. The study presents the results of a potential source zone identification based on an established catalog. Considering the weighted value, three distinct procedures are employed to calculate the maximum possible magnitudes for these zones. In this context, a comparison of the projected effects for the cities of Targua and Adassil, located in the severely devastated province of Chichaoua, demonstrates a satisfactory match between the observed and expected damage to the infrastructure.
Near real-time earthquake loss estimation, scenario events, source zones, Extremum information system, calibration of macroseismic field models, Morocco
1. AISE. The Agadir, Morocco earthquake February 29, 1960. — Committee of Structural Steel Producers of American Iron, Steel Institute, 1962.
2. Ait Brahim L., Chotin P., Hinaj S., et al. Paleostress evolution in the Moroccan African margin from Triassic to present // Tectonophysics. — 2002. — Vol. 357, no. 1–4. — P. 187–205. — https://doi.org/10.1016/s0040-1951(02)00368-2.
3. Aliaj Sh. Basic Seismotectonic Feautures of Albania // Earthquake Risk Reduction in the Balkan region. Working Group A, Seismology, Seismotectonics, Seismic Hazards and Earthquake Predictions, Final Report, A27-A32. — Athens : UNESCO, UNDRO, 1982.
4. Allen T. I. and Wald D. J. Evaluation of ground-motion modeling techniques for use in Global ShakeMap - A critique of instrumental ground-motion prediction equations, peak ground motion to macroseismic intensity conversions, and macroseismic intensity predictions in different tectonic settings. — U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2009-1047, 2009. — 114 p.
5. Allen T. I., Wald D. J. and Worden C. B. Intensity attenuation for active crustal regions // Journal of Seismology. — 2012. — Vol. 16, no. 3. — P. 409–433. — https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-012-9278-7.
6. Ambraseys N. N. Intensity-attenuation and magnitude-intensity relationships for northwest European earthquakes // Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics. — 1985. — Vol. 13. — P. 733–788.
7. Benjamin J. R. and Cornell C. A. Probability, Statistics, and Decision for Civil Engineers. — New York : McGraw-Hill, 1970. — 712 p.
8. Benouar D. Magnitude-intensity and intensity-attenuation relationships for atlas region and Algerian earthquakes // Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics. — 1994. — Vol. 23, no. 7. — P. 717–727. — https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290230703.
9. Chalouan A., Gil A. J., Chabli A., et al. cGPS Record of Active Extension in Moroccan Meseta and Shortening in Atlasic Chains under the Eurasia-Nubia Convergence // Sensors. — 2023. — Vol. 23, no. 10. — https://doi.org/10.3390/s23104846.
10. Chavez J., Goula X., Roca A., et al. Preliminary risk assessment for Catalonia (Spain) // Proc. 11th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paris, 6-11 September [CD-ROM]. — 1998.
11. Cheng R. C. H. and Traylor L. Non-regular maximum likelihood problems // Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology. — 1995. — Vol. 57, no. 1. — P. 3–24. — https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02013.x.
12. Cherkaoui T. E. M. Fichier des séismes du Maroc et des régions limitrophes: 1901-1984. — Rabat, Morocco : Institut Scientifique, 1988. — 158 p. — (In French).
13. Cherkaoui T. E. M. Contribution á l’étude de l’aléa sismique au Maroc. — Université Joseph-Fourier - Grenoble I, 1991. — (In French).
14. Cooke P. Statistical inference for bounds of random variables // Biometrika. — 1979. — Vol. 66, no. 2. — P. 367–374. — https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/66.2.367.
15. Craig T. J., Jackson J. A., Priestley K., et al. Earthquake distribution patterns in Africa: their relationship to variations in lithospheric and geological structure, and their rheological implications // Geophysical Journal International. — 2011. — Vol. 185, no. 1. — P. 403–434. — https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246x.2011.04950.x.
16. Cramer H. Mathematical Methods of Statistics. — Princeton : Princeton University Press, 1946. — P. 589.
17. De Groeve T. Global Disaster Alert and Coordination System: More Effective and Efficient Humanitarian Response // The 14th TIEMS Annual Conference 2007 Book of Proceedings. — Split (Croatia) : Hydrographic Institute of the Republic of Croatia, 2007. — P. 324–334.
18. De Groeve T., Annunziato A., Gadenz S., et al. Real-time Impact Estimation of Large Earthquakes Using USGS Shakemaps // Proceedings of the International Disaster and Risk Conference. — Davos (Switzerland) : IDRC International Disaster Risk Reduction Center, 2008.
19. Delvaux D. and Sperner B. New aspects of tectonic stress inversion with reference to the TENSOR program // Geological Society, London, Special Publications. — 2003. — Vol. 212, no. 1. — P. 75–100. — https://doi.org/10.1144/gsl.sp.2003.212.01.06.
20. DeMets C., Gordon R. G. and Argus D. F. Geologically current plate motions // Geophysical Journal International. — 2010. — Vol. 181, no. 1. — P. 1–80. — https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246x.2009.04491.x.
21. EERI Committee. Glossary of terms for probabilistic seismic-risk and hazard analysis // Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering. — 1986. — Vol. 19, no. 3. — P. 155–157. — https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.19.3.155-157.
22. El Hammoumi A., Iben Brahim A., Birouk A., et al. Assessment of Seismic Vulnerability of Urban Buildings in Morocco // International Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Hazard Mitigation (IREHM). — 2015. — Vol. 3, no. 1. — P. 24–28.
23. European Microseismic Scale 1998. EMS-98 / ed. by G. Grünthal. — Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie, 1998. — https://doi.org/10.2312/EMS-98.FULL.EN.
24. Frolova N. I., Larionov V. I., Bonnin J., et al. Loss caused by earthquakes: rapid estimates // Natural Hazards. — 2017. — Vol. 88, S1. — P. 63–80. — https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2653-x.
25. Frolova N. I., Larionov V. I., Bonnin J., et al. Seismic Risk Cartographic Visualization for Crisis Management // Geography, Environment, Sustainability. — 2014. — Vol. 7, no. 4. — P. 4–27. — https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2014-7-4-4-27.
26. Gorshkov G. P. On the seismicity of Africa // Byulleten Soveta po seysmologii AN SSSR. — Moscow, 1963a. — No. 13. — (In Russian).
27. Gorshkov G. P. The seismicity of Africa, Chapter 3 // A review of the natural resources of the African continent. — UNESCO, 1963b.
28. Gutenberg B. and Richter C. F. Earthquake magnitude, intensity, energy, and acceleration // Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. — 1942. — Vol. 32, no. 3. — P. 163–191. — https://doi.org/10.1785/bssa0320030163.
29. Gutenberg B. and Richter C. F. Seismicity of the Earth and Associated Phenomena. — Princeton, New Jersey : Princeton University Press, 1949.
30. Gutenberg B. and Richter C. F. Earthquake magnitude, intensity, energy, and acceleration: (Second paper) // Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. — 1956. — Vol. 46, no. 2. — P. 105–145. — https://doi.org/10.1785/bssa0460020105.
31. Hamdache M., Peláez J. A., Gospodinov D., et al. Stochastic Modeling of the Al Hoceima (Morocco) Aftershock Sequences of 1994, 2004 and 2016 // Applied Sciences. — 2022. — Vol. 12, no. 17. — https://doi.org/10.3390/app12178744.
32. Hamdache M., Peláez J. A., Kijko A., et al. Energetic and spatial characterization of seismicity in the Algeria-Morocco region // Natural Hazards. — 2016. — Vol. 86, S2. — P. 273–293. — https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2514-7.
33. Handbook of Mathematical Functions With Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables / ed. by M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun. — U.S. Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, 1972. — 1082 p.
34. Hasterok D., Halpin J. A., Collins A. S., et al. New Maps of Global Geological Provinces and Tectonic Plates // EarthScience Reviews. — 2022. — Vol. 231. — P. 104069. — https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104069.
35. Henares J., López Casado C., Sanz de Galdeano C., et al. Stress fields in the Iberian-Maghrebi region // Journal of Seismology. — 2003. — Vol. 7, no. 1. — P. 65–78. — https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021294015027.
36. Kagan Y. Y. Seismic moment distribution // Geophysical Journal International. — 1991. — Vol. 106, no. 1. — P. 123– 134. — https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246x.1991.tb04606.x.
37. Kagan Y. Y. Seismic moment distribution revisited: I. Statistical results // Geophysical Journal International. — 2002a. — Vol. 148, no. 3. — P. 520–541. — https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246x.2002.01594.x.
38. Kagan Y. Y. Seismic moment distribution revisited: II. Moment conservation principle // Geophysical Journal International. — 2002b. — Vol. 149, no. 3. — P. 731–754. — https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246x.2002.01671.x.
39. Kariche J., Meghraoui M., Timoulali Y., et al. The Al Hoceima earthquake sequence of 1994, 2004 and 2016: Stress transfer and poroelasticity in the Rif and Alboran Sea region // Geophysical Journal International. — 2018. — Vol. 212, no. 1. — P. 42–53. — https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggx385.
40. Kijko A. Estimation of the Maximum Earthquake Magnitude, m max // Pure and Applied Geophysics. — 2004. — Vol. 161, no. 8. — P. 1655–1681. — https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-004-2531-4.
41. Kijko A., Lasocki S. and Graham G. Non-parametric Seismic Hazard in Mines // Pure and Applied Geophysics. — 2001. — Vol. 158, no. 9. — P. 1655–1675. — https://doi.org/10.1007/pl00001238.
42. Kijko A. and Sellevoll M. A. Estimation of earthquake hazard parameters from incomplete data files. Part I. Utilization of extreme and complete catalogs with different threshold magnitudes // Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. — 1989. — Vol. 79, no. 3. — P. 645–654. — https://doi.org/10.1785/bssa0790030645.
43. Kijko A. and Sellevoll M. A. Estimation of earthquake hazard parameters from incomplete data files. Part II. Incorporation of magnitude heterogeneity // Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. — 1992. — Vol. 82, no. 1. — P. 120– 134.
44. Kijko A. and Singh M. Statistical tools for maximum possible earthquake magnitude estimation // Acta Geophysica. — 2011. — Vol. 59, no. 4. — P. 674–700. — https://doi.org/10.2478/s11600-011-0012-6.
45. Kijko A. and Vermeulen P. J. On pitfalls in the estimation of the maximum m max // Preprint. — 2022.
46. Kowsari M., Halldorsson B., Jónsson S., et al. On maximum earthquake scenario of the Tjornes fracture zone, North Iceland for seismic hazard assessment // 16th World Conference on Earthquake. — Santiago, Chile, 2017.
47. Larionov V. and Frolova N. Peculiarities of seismic vulnerability estimations // Natural Hazards in Russia, volume 6: Natural Risks Assessment and Management. — Moscow : Publishing company "KRUK", 2003. — P. 120–131. — (In Russian).
48. Larionov V., Sushchev S., Ugarov A., et al. Seismic risk assessment with GIS-technology application // Natural Hazards in Russia, volume 6: Natural Risks Assessment and Management. — Moscow : Publishing company "KRUK", 2003. — P. 209–231. — (In Russian).
49. LeCam L. On the Assumptions Used to Prove Asymptotic Normality of Maximum Likelihood Estimates // The Annals of Mathematical Statistics. — 1970. — Vol. 41, no. 3. — P. 802–828. — https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177696960.
50. Letamo Alemayehu, B Kavitha and TP Tezeswi. Seismicity pattern of African regions from 1964-2022: b-value and energy mapping approach // Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk. — 2023. — Vol. 14, no. 1. — P. 2197104. — https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2023.2197104.
51. López Casado C., Sanz de Galdeano C., Molina Palacios S., et al. The structure of the Alboran Sea: an interpretation from seismological and geological data // Tectonophysics. — 2001. — Vol. 338, no. 2. — P. 79–95. — https://doi.org/10.1016/s0040-1951(01)00059-2.
52. Medvedev S., Sponheuer W. and Kárník V. Neue seismische Skala // 7. Tagung der Europäischen Seismologischen Kommission vom 24.9. bis 30.9. 1962 in Jena, DDR. — De Gruyter, 1964. — P. 69–76. — https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112756430-019. — (In German).
53. Meghraoui M. and the IGBP-601 working group. The Seismotectonic Map of Africa // Episodes. — 2016. — Vol. 39, no. 1. — P. 9–18. — https://doi.org/10.18814/epiiugs/2016/v39i1/89232.
54. Methodology for predicting the consequences of earthquakes. — Moscow : VNII GOChS, Extreme Situations Research Center, Seismological Center of IGE RAS, 2000. — 27 p. — (In Russian).
55. Mezcua J. Catálogo general de isosistas de la Península Ibérica. — Madrid : Instituto Geográfico Nacional, 1982. — (In Spanish).
56. Mridekh A. Géodynamique des bassins méso-cénozoiques de l’offshore d’Agadir (Maroc sud occidental). Contribution á la connaissance de l’évolution atlasique d’un segment de la marge atlantique marocaine. PhD Thesis. — Kenitra, Morocco : Faculty of Sciences, 2002.
57. New Catalog of Strong Earthquakes in the U.S.S.R. from Ancient Times Through 1977 / ed. by N. V. Kondorskaya and N. V. Shebalin. — M. : World Data Center A for Solid Earth Geophysics, 1982. — 608 p.
58. Nievas C. I., Crowley H., Weatherill G., et al. Real-Time Loss Tools: Open-Source Software for Time- and State-Dependent Seismic Damage and Loss Calculations - Features and Application to the 2023 Türkiye-Syria Sequence // Seismica. — 2025. — Vol. 4, no. 1. — https://doi.org/10.26443/seismica.v4i1.1238.
59. Parzen E. On Estimation of a Probability Density Function and Mode // The Annals of Mathematical Statistics. — 1962. — Vol. 33, no. 3. — P. 1065–1076. — https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177704472.
60. Pedrera A., Ruiz-Constán A., Galindo-Zaldívar J., et al. Is there an active subduction beneath the Gibraltar orogenic arc? Constraints from Pliocene to present-day stress field // Journal of Geodynamics. — 2011. — Vol. 52, no. 2. — P. 83–96. — https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2010.12.003.
61. Peláez J. A., Chourak M., Tadili B. A., et al. A Catalog of Main Moroccan Earthquakes from 1045 to 2005 // Seismological Research Letters. — 2007. — Vol. 78, no. 6. — P. 614–621. — https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.78.6.614.
62. Peláez J. A., Henares J., Hamdache M., et al. A Seismogenic Zone Model for Seismic Hazard Studies in Northwestern Africa // Moment Tensor Solutions. — Springer International Publishing, 2018a. — P. 643–680. — https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77359-9_29.
63. Peláez J. A., Henares J., Hamdache M., et al. An Updated seismic model for Northwestern Africa // 16th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering. — Thessaloniki : EAEE, 2018b.
64. Pisarenko V. F. Statistical Evaluation of Maximum Possible Magnitud // Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSSR. Fizika Zemli. — 1991. — No. 9. — P. 38–46. — (In Russian).
65. Pisarenko V. F. and Rodkin M. Approaches to Solving the Maximum Possible Earthquake Magnitude (Mmax) Problem // Surveys in Geophysics. — 2022. — Vol. 43, no. 2. — P. 561–595. — https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-021-09673-1.
66. Pisarenko V. F., Sornette D. and Rodkin M. V. Distribution of maximum earthquake magnitudes in future time intervals: application to the seismicity of Japan (1923-2007) // Earth, Planets and Space. — 2010. — Vol. 62, no. 7. — P. 567– 578. — https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2010.06.003.
67. Polat T. Kahramanmaraş Merkezli Depremlerin Arama Kurtarma Teknisyenleri Tarafindan Değerlendirilmesi // Afet ve Risk Dergisi. — 2024. — Vol. 7, no. 2. — P. 329–340. — https://doi.org/10.35341/afet.1287897.
68. Rosas F. M., Duarte J. C., Neves M. C., et al. Thrust-wrench interference between major active faults in the Gulf of Cadiz (Africa-Eurasia plate boundary, offshore SW Iberia): Tectonic implications from coupled analog and numerical modeling // Tectonophysics. — 2012. — Vol. 548/549. — P. 1–21. — https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2012.04.013.
69. Sébrier M., Siame L., Zouine E. M., et al. Active tectonics in the Moroccan High Atlas // Comptes Rendus. Géoscience. — 2006. — Vol. 338, no. 1/2. — P. 65–79. — https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2005.12.001.
70. Shebalin N. V. Methods of using engineering seismological data in seismic zoning // Seismic zoning of the USSR. — M. : Nauka, 1968. — P. 95–121. — (In Russian).
71. Shebalin N. V., Ershov I. A., Shestoperov G. S., et al. Improved version of the seismic intensity scale (MMSK-86) based on the MSK-64 and MCCCC-73 scales (final report). — Moscow : MCCCC, Institute of Physical Earth Sciences of the USSR Academy of Sciences, 1986. — (In Russian).
72. Shebalin N. V., Leydecker G., Mokrushina N. G., et al. Earthquake Catalogue for Central and South-eastern Europe 342 BC - 1990 AD. — Final Report to Contract ETNU - CT 93 - 0087, 1998.
73. Skobelev S. F., Hanon M., Klerkx J., et al. Active faults in Africa: a review // Tectonophysics. — 2004. — Vol. 380, no. 3/4. — P. 131–137. — https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2003.10.016.
74. Sleiman Ch., Thomas K., Gray J., et al. Emergency Management of Tomorrow Research: Landscape Assessment. A Summary Report of Peer-Reviewed Research in Emergency Management from 2018-2023. — U.S. Department of Homeland Security, 2024.
75. Sparacino F., Palano M., Peláez J. A., et al. Geodetic Deformation versus Seismic Crustal Moment-Rates: Insights from the Ibero-Maghrebian Region // Remote Sensing. — 2020. — Vol. 12, no. 6. — P. 952. — https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12060952.
76. Stone C. J. An Asymptotically Optimal Window Selection Rule for Kernel Density Estimates // The Annals of Statistics. — 1984. — Vol. 12, no. 4. — https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176346792.
77. The OpenQuake-engine User Manual. Global Earthquake Model (GEM) Open-Quake Manual for Engine version 3.0.0. — GEM, 2018. — 198 p.
78. UNOSAT. Preliminary satellite-derived damage assessment. Adassil/Al Haouz, 6.8M earthquake of 08-09-2023 (22:11 UTC) Chichaoua Province, Marrakech-Safi Region, Morocco. — UNITAR, 2023.
79. van der Woerd J., Dorbath C., Ousadou F., et al. The Al Hoceima Mw 6.4 earthquake of 24 February 2004 and its aftershocks sequence // Journal of Geodynamics. — 2014. — Vol. 77. — P. 89–109. — https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2013.12.004.
80. Vázquez R., Macías J. L., Alcalá-Reygosa J., et al. Numerical modeling and hazard implications of landslides at the Ardillas Volcanic Dome (Tacaná Volcanic Complex, Mexico-Guatemala) // Natural Hazards. — 2022. — Vol. 113, no. 2. — P. 1305–1333. — https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05348-1.
81. WGCEP. Seismic hazards in southern California: Probable earthquakes, 1994 to 2024 // Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. — 1995. — Vol. 85, no. 2. — P. 379–439. — https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0850020379.
82. Wheeler R. L. Methods of Mmax estimation east of the Rocky Mountains. — U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2009-1018, 2009. — 44 p.
