1. Abramov D. V., Drobyshev M. N. and Koneshov V. N. Estimating the influence of seismic and meteorological factors on the accuracy of measurements by relative gravimeters // Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth. — 2013. — Vol. 49, no. 4. — P. 548–553. — https://doi.org/10.1134/s1069351313040010
2. Andreev D. and Muhamadiev D. Perspective Ways to Improve the Accuracy of Measurements in Modern Gravity Prospection // GeoBaikal 2018. — European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 2018. — https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201802064
3. Andreev D. S., Mikhailov S. A. and Chernov M. L. The influence of seismic noise on high-precision gravity measurements - an unaccounted for interference or a new source of information? // GeoBaikal 2022. — 2023. — P. 85–88. — (In Russian).
4. Bolshakova N. V. and Fedorova K. S. The Possibilities of Using a Qualitative Interpretation of The Potential for Creating a Zonal-Block Model of The Northern Flank of The Okhotsk Sea Region // Engineering and Mining Geophysics 2021. — European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 2021. — P. 1–7. — https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202152157
5. Budanov L. M., Senchina N. P., Shnyukova O. M., et al. Study of paleochannels by means of gravimetric observations // Geosystems of Transition Zones. — 2020. — Vol. 4, no. 3. — P. 288–296. — https://doi.org/10.30730/gtrz.2020.4.3.288-296 — (In Russian).
6. Bychkov S. G., Prostolupov G. V. and Simanov A. A. Industrial noise during high-precision gravity research // Geophysics. — 2024. — No. 5. — P. 20–23. — https://doi.org/10.34926/geo.2024.35.94.005
7. Dashko R. E. and Kolosova D. L. Interdisciplinary Approach as Basis for Enhancing Construction and Operation Safety of Industrial Hydraulic Structures // Sustainability. — 2025. — Vol. 17, no. 12. — P. 5244–5260. — https://doi.org/10.3390/su17125244
8. Geological atlas of St. Petersburg / ed. by N. B. Philippov. — St. Petersburg : Comilfo, 2009. — 57 p.
9. Kalinin D. F., Dolgal A. S. and Voroshilov V. A. Probabilistic analysis of geological and structural Prospects for Oil and gas Potential in Western Yakutia Using three-Dimensional Empirical Mode Decomposition of Potential Fields // Georesources. — 2024. — Vol. 26, no. 2. — P. 53–68. — https://doi.org/10.18599/grs.2024.2.6 — (In Russian).
10. Kalinin D. F., Egorov A. S. and Bolshakova N. V. Oil and Gas Potential of the West Kamchatka Coast and Its Relation to the Structural and Tectonic Setting of the Sea of Okhotsk Region Based on Geophysical Data // Russian Journal of Pacific Geology. — 2023. — Vol. 17, S2. — S21–S34. — https://doi.org/10.1134/s1819714023080067
11. Lebedeva Ya., Kotiukov P. and Lange I. Study of the Geo-Ecological State of Groundwater of Metropolitan Areas under the Conditions of Intensive Contamination Thereof // Journal of Ecological Engineering. — 2020. — Vol. 21, no. 2. — P. 157–165. — https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/116322
12. Märdla S., Ellmann A., Oja T., et al. Improving and Validating Gravity Data Over Ice-Covered Marine Areas // IAG 150 Years. — Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2015. — P. 263–270. — https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2015_163
13. Martyshko P., Byzov Denys and Osipova A. Model of the structure of the Earth’s crust and Upper Mantle along the Middle Ural transect (Based on the results of Volumetric seismic Density Modeling) // Georesources. — 2024. — Vol. 26, no. 4. — P. 144–152. — https://doi.org/10.18599/grs.2024.4.3
14. Medvedev N. O., Senchina N. P., Gorelik G. D., et al. Comparison of gravimetric and seismometric measurement results on the ice of the Sestroretsky Spill (Saint Petersburg) // Geophysical Research. — 2024. — Vol. 25, no. 3. — P. 87–103. — https://doi.org/10.21455/gr2024.3-6 — (In Russian).
15. Mingaleva T., Gorelik G., Egorov A., et al. Correction of Depth-Velocity Models by Gravity Prospecting for Hard-to-Reach Areas of the Shelf Zone // Mining informational and analytical bulletin. — 2022. — No. 10/1. — P. 77–86. — https://doi.org/10.25018/0236_1493_2022_101_0_77 — (In Russian).
16. Oja T., Bloom A., Talvik S., et al. Relative gravity measurements on ice-covered water bodies // IAG Scientific Assembly. — 2013. — https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.27974.16965
17. Talovina I. V., Mangal F., Smuk G. V., et al. Geological and geophysical data interpretation for deep structure study of the Kabul Massif // Gornyi Zhurnal. — 2024. — No. 9. — P. 68–77. — https://doi.org/10.17580/gzh.2024.09.11
18. Ugalde H. A., L’Heureux E., Lachapelle R., et al. Measuring gravity on ice: An example from Wanapitei Lake, Ontario, Canada // Geophysics. — 2006. — Vol. 71, no. 3. — J23–J29. — https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2189387
19. Vyazmin V. S., Golovan A. A. and Brovkin G. I. Features of processing strapdown airborne gravimeter measurements for geophysical applications // Geophysical Research. — 2024. — Vol. 25, no. 1. — P. 40–56. — https://doi.org/10.21455/gr2024.1-3 — (In Russian).
20. Yakovleva A. A., Movchan I. B. and Shaygallyamova Z. I. Dynamic response of multi-scale geophysical systems: waves and practical applications // Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. — 2022. — Vol. 380, no. 2237. — https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2021.0403