1. Abdullaeva I. V., Bredikhin A. V. Recreational-geomorphological zoning of the South-Eastern Baltic Coast // Problems of regional ecology. — 2018. — No. 2. — P. 119–123. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.24411/1728-323X-2018-12119. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XTCFFJ
2. Akaev B. A., Ataev Z. V., Gadzhieva Z. K., et al. Physical geography of Dagestan: a textbook for students. — Moscow : Shkola, 1996. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UPWTVT
3. Arora K., Rajput S., Anand R. R. Geomorphosites assessment for the development of scientific geo-tourism in North and Middle Andaman’s, India // GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites. — 2020. — Vol. 32, no. 4. — P. 1244–1251. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.30892/gtg.32408-564. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PAGJTZ
4. Ataev Z. V. Orography of Eastern Caucasian high mountains // Geographical bulletin. — 2012. — 2(11). — P. 4–9. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/VDXCSR
5. Ataev Z. V., Bratkov V. V. Relief as a factor of spatial differentiation and settlement development of landscapes of Dagestan // Priority directions of science and education development. — 2015. — 4(7). — P. 21–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46698/VNC.2024.21.47.003; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/EZFBKV
6. Babeshko V. A., V.Evdokimova O., Babeshko O. M., et al. About earthquake precursors in an earthquake-prone mountainous area // Geology and Geophysics of Russian South. — 2024. — Vol. 14, no. 2. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.46698/vnc.2024.21.47.003.
7. Bayrak G. R., Teodorovych L. V. Geological and geomorphological objects of the Ukrainian Carpathians’ Beskid Mountains and their tourist attractiveness // Journal of Geology, Geography and Geoecology. — 2020. — Vol. 29, no. 1. — P. 16–29. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.15421/112002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24412/2500-1000-2023-4-3-33-38; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/DRKUUC
8. Bosson J.-B., Reynard E. Geomorphological heritage, conservation and promotion in high-alpine protected areas // Journal on Protected Mountain Areas Research. — 2012. — Vol. 4, no. 1. — P. 13–22. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.1553/eco.mont-4-1s13. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HRMSGJ
9. Chichinadze T. Geomorphological Zoning of Racha Region for Geopark Planning // Open Journal of Geology. — 2022. — Vol. 12, no. 03. — P. 179–187. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.4236/ojg.2022.123009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25744/genb.2021.23.1.003; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/GBMDBP
10. Dotsenko V. V. Geomorphology of North Yursk depression within the Chechen Republic and adjacent territories // Grozny Natural Science Bulletin. — 2021. — Vol. 6, no. 1. — P. 17–40. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.25744/genb.2021.23.1.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46698/VNC.2023.14.67.012; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/MAYCGG
11. Erdenejargal N., Dorjsuren B., Choijinjav L., et al. Evaluation of the Natural Landscape Aesthetic: a Case Study of Uvs Province, Mongolia // Polish Journal of Environmental Studies. — 2021. — Vol. 30, no. 5. — P. 4497–4509. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/132788. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TKZVTP
12. Gavrik A. V. Relief of the Leningrad region as a basis for recreational nature management // International journal of humanities and natural sciences. — 2023. — Vol. 4–3, no. 79. — P. 33–38. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.24412/2500-1000-2023-4-3-33-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34824/VKNIIRAN.2021.7.3.008; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WAKSOW
13. Golovlev A. A. Map of the physical-geographical zoning of the territory of Mountainous Chechnya // Bulletin of Higher Educational Institutions. North Caucasus Region. Natural Science. — 2005. — No. 4. — P. 42–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21782/GIPR0206-1619-2017-2(5-16); EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YSKUWF
14. Hou Y., Zhao W., Hua T., et al. Mapping and assessment of recreation services in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau // Science of The Total Environment. — 2022. — Vol. 838. — P. 156432. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0435428121010077; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/FEPRHL
15. Karaev Yu. I., Vaskov I. M., Gunya A. N., et al. UNESCO Global Geoparks for sustainable development of mountain territories (North Caucasus, Chechen Republic) // Bulletin of the KNII RAS. — 2021. — Vol. 3, no. 7. — P. 66–76. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.34824/VKNIIRAN.2021.7.3.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2079-7877-2017-4-161-169; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YLJJTE
16. Korytny L. M. The basin concept: From hydrology to nature management // Geography and Natural Resources. — 2017. — Vol. 38, no. 2. — P. 111–121. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.1134/S1875372817020019. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/IIUCPL
17. Kubalíková L., Kirchner K., Bajer A. Geomorphological Resources for Geoeducation and Geotourism // Global Geographical Heritage, Geoparks and Geotourism. — Springer Singapore, 2020. — P. 343–358. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4956-4_18.
18. Kuzmin S. B. Types and objectives of geomorphological zoning // Geomorphology. — 2021. — Vol. 52, no. 1. — P. 61–74. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.31857/S0435428121010077. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WGODWL
19. Lima B., Silva C., Martins P., et al. Visual quality of the landscape: the tourist attractiveness of Serra do Amolar, Pantanal, Brazil // Journal of Tourism and Heritage Research. — 2023. — Vol. 6, no. 4. — P. 81–95.
20. Los M. A. Assessment of the relief of the Tyumen and Tobolsk tourist and recreational framework for tourism development // Geographical bulletin. — 2017. — 4(43). — P. 161–169. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.17072/2079-7877-2017-4-161-169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30892/gtg.32408-564; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SEQDOC
21. Mäntymaa E., Tyrväinen L., Juutinen A., et al. Importance of forest landscape quality for companies operating in nature tourism areas // Land Use Policy. — 2021. — Vol. 107. — P. 104095. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104095. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15421/112002; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/FOYFUY
22. Mardasova E. V., Golyadkina E. I. Assessment of the Charyshsky district relief of the Altay Krai for the purposes of tourist and recreational activities development // Geography and nature management of Siberia. — 2020. — No. 27. — P. 140–149.
23. Mironenko N. S. Assessment of recreational potential of the North of Russia. — Smolensk : Madzhenta, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojg.2022.123009; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BYYSLT
24. Mishurinskij D. V., Bredikhin A. V. Recreational-geomorphological information support of tourist activities // Moscow University Bulletin. Series 5, Geography. — 2020. — No. 4. — P. 42–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/132788; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/FEZPPH
25. Recreational use of territories and forest protection / ed. by V. B. Nefedova, E. D. Smirnova, et al. — Moscow : Forest industry, 1980. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156432; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HMWWMS
26. Ruiz-Pedrosa R. M., González-Amuchástegui M. J., Serrano E. Geomorphosites as Geotouristic Resources: Assessment of Geomorphological Heritage for Local Development in the Río Lobos Natural Park // Land. — 2024. — Vol. 13, no. 2. — P. 128. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/land13020128.
27. Schirpke U., Meisch C., Marsoner T., et al. Revealing spatial and temporal patterns of outdoor recreation in the European Alps and their surroundings // Ecosystem Services. — 2018. — Vol. 31. — P. 336–350. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.11.017.
28. Uncu L., Karakoca E. Evaluating the Geomorphological Features and Geotourism Potentials of Harmankaya Canyon (Bilecik, Turkey) // Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Management. — 2019. — Vol. 7, no. 1. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.17265/2328-2169/2019.01.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104095; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SRFGLK
29. Vedenin Yu. A., Miroshnichenko N. N. Assessment of natural conditions for recreation // Bulletin of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR. Geographical Series. — 1969. — No. 4. — P. 51–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land13020128; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LMHIQK
30. Vukoičić D., Ristić D., Milinčić U., et al. Assessment of the Attractiveness of Natural Resources and Landscapes of the Kopaonik National Park (Serbia): Framework and Importance for Tourism Development // Polish Journal of Environmental Studies. — 2022. — Vol. 32, no. 1. — P. 281–295. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/152378.
31. Zaburaeva Kh. Sh., Krasnov E. V. Ecologic-geomorphologic systems of the North-Eastern Caucasus and their typology // Geomorphology. — 2015. — No. 1. — P. 41–47.
32. Zaburaeva Kh. Sh., Zaburaev Ch., Sedieva M. Geological and ethnocultural tourism: prospects for interrelated development in the North-Eastern Caucasus // Geology and Geophysics of Russian South. — 2023a. — No. 2. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.46698/vnc.2023.14.67.012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/152378; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LRANTO
33. Zaburaeva Kh. Sh., Zaburaev Ch., Sedieva M., et al. Ecological Tourism in the Mountainous Regions of Russia: Essence and Development Prospects // Russian Journal of Earth Sciences. — 2023b. — P. 1–10. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.2205/2023ES000867. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/DVHWPR
34. Ziernicka-Wojtaszek A., Malec M. Evaluating Local Attractiveness for Tourism and Recreation-A Case Study of the Communes in Brzeski County, Poland // Land. — 2021. — Vol. 11, no. 1. — P. 39. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/land11010039. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SIQHMM