UDC
551.510.413.5 504.35 550.348.436 55 550.34
1 more Collapse
550.383
CSCSTI
37.01 37.15 37.25 37.31 38.01
5 more Collapse
36.00 37.00 38.00 39.00 52.00
Russian Classification of Professions by Education
05.00.00
Russian Trade and Bibliographic Classification
63
Russian Library and Bibliographic Classification
26
BISAC
SCI
VAK Russia
1.6

IONOSPHERIC RESPONSE TO THE SEISMIC WAVE INDUCED BY THE KAMCHATKA EARTHQUAKE ON JULY 29, 2025 Ionospheric Response to the Seismic Wave Induced by the Kamchatka Earthquake on July 29, 2025

Published in Russian Journal of Earth Sciences · ELocator: ES2021 · Rubric: KAMCHATKA EARTHQUAKE M 8.8 ON JULY 29, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2205/2026es001131 · EDN: CYKDQR
Received: 02.02.2026 Accepted: 25.05.2026 Published: 01.07.2026 Language of publication: ENG
The July 29, 2025 earthquake near the eastern coast of the Kamchatka Peninsula induced a high-amplitude seismic wave that propagated thousands of kilometers from the epicenter. Ground vibrations caused variations in surface air pressure with periods in the infrasonic range, which propagated almost vertically into the upper atmosphere and modulated the ionospheric plasma. The resulting ionospheric disturbances were, in turn, recorded by a number of radiophysical facilities monitoring the ionosphere. In this paper, we provide an overview of the effects caused by the passage of the seismic wave, which were observed during ionospheric monitoring using vertical, oblique, and sky-wave backscatter sounding techniques in the Asian part of Russia.
Lithosphere-atmosphere-ionosphere coupling, ionosphere monitoring, vertical sounding, oblique sounding, sky-wave backscatter sounding, HF radar, infrasound, Kamchatka megathrust earthquake
Funding
This study was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (projects FWSE-2026-0003, FWZZ-2026-0051, and FWZZ-2026-0052). The results were obtained using the Core Shared Research Facility “Angara” of ISTP SB RAS (https://ckp-rf.ru/catalog/ckp/3056/).
Text References
Text (PDF)
Read Download

1. Afraimovich E. L., Perevalova N. P., Plotnikov A. V., et al. The shock-acoustic waves generated by earthquakes // Annales Geophysicae. — 2001. — Vol. 19, no. 4. — P. 395–409. — https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-19-395-2001

2. Artru J., Farges T. and Lognonné P. Acoustic waves generated from seismic surface waves: propagation properties determined from Doppler sounding observations and normal-mode modeling // Geophysical Journal International. — 2004. — Vol. 158, no. 3. — P. 1067–1077. — https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246x.2004.02377.x

3. Berngardt O. I., Kurkin V. I., Kushnarev D. S., et al. ISTP SB RAS decameter radars // Solar-Terrestrial Physics. — 2020. — Vol. 6, no. 2. — P. 63–73. — https://doi.org/10.12737/stp-62202006

4. Cedrik M. V., Oinats A. V., Podlesnyi A. V., et al. Modeling of the ionosphere response to the passage of the Rayleigh wave caused by the earthquake in Taiwan on April 2, 2024 // Radio Propagation: Proceedings of the XXIX All-Russian Open Scientific Conference. — Kazan : Kazan University Press, 2025. — P. 80–83. — https://doi.org/10.26907/rwp29.2025.80-83 — (In Russian).

5. Chum J., Hruska F., Zednik J., et al. Ionospheric disturbances (infrasound waves) over the Czech Republic excited by the 2011 Tohoku earthquake // Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics. — 2012. — Vol. 117, A8. — https://doi.org/10.1029/2012ja017767

6. Chum J., Liu J. Y., Laštovička J., et al. Ionospheric signatures of the April 25, 2015 Nepal earthquake and the relative role of compression and advection for Doppler sounding of infrasound in the ionosphere // Earth, Planets and Space. — 2016. — Vol. 68, no. 1. — https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-016-0401-9

7. Davis K. and Baker D. M. Ionospheric effects observed around the time of the Alaskan earthquake of March 28, 1964 // Journal of Geophysical Research. — 1965. — Vol. 70, no. 9. — P. 2251–2253. — https://doi.org/10.1029/jz070i009p02251

8. Leonard R. S. and Jr. R. A. Barnes. Observation of ionospheric disturbances following the Alaska earthquake // Journal of Geophysical Research. — 1965. — Vol. 70, no. 5. — P. 1250–1253. — https://doi.org/10.1029/jz070i005p01250

9. Lighthill M. J. Waves in fluids. — Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press, 2001.

10. Liu J. Y., Chen C. H., Sun Y. Y., et al. The vertical propagation of disturbances triggered by seismic waves of the 11 March 2011 M9.0 Tohoku earthquake over Taiwan // Geophysical Research Letters. — 2016. — Vol. 43, no. 4. — P. 1759–1765. — https://doi.org/10.1002/2015gl067487

11. Maruyama T. and Shinagawa H. Infrasonic sounds excited by seismic waves of the 2011 Tohoku-oki earthquake as visualized in ionograms // Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics. — 2014. — Vol. 119, no. 5. — P. 4094– 4108. — https://doi.org/10.1002/2013ja019707

12. Maruyama T., Tsugawa T., Kato H., et al. Rayleigh wave signature in ionograms induced by strong earthquakes // Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics. — 2012. — Vol. 117, A8. — https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JA017952

13. Nishitani N., Ogawa T., Otsuka Y., et al. Propagation of large amplitude ionospheric disturbances with velocity dispersion observed by the SuperDARN Hokkaido radar after the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake // Earth, Planets and Space. — 2011. — Vol. 63, no. 7. — P. 891–896. — https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2011.07.003

14. Ogawa T., Nishitani N., Tsugawa T., et al. Giant ionospheric disturbances observed with the SuperDARN Hokkaido HF radar and GPS network after the 2011 Tohoku earthquake // Earth, Planets and Space. — 2012. — Vol. 64, no. 12. — P. 1295–1307. — https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2012.08.001

15. Podlesnyi A. V., Brynko I. G., Kurkin V. I., et al. Multifunctional LFM ionosonde to the ionosphere monitoring // Heliogeophysical Research. — 2013. — Vol. 4. — P. 24–31. — (In Russian).

16. Pokhotelov O. A., Parrot M., Fedorov E. N., et al. Response of the ionosphere to natural and man-made acoustic sources // Annales Geophysicae. — 1995. — Vol. 13, no. 11. — P. 1197–1210. — https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-995-1197-2

17. Ponomarchuk S. N., Grozov V. P. and Kotovich G. V. Technique of ionospheric parameters automatic determination from data of vertical sounding with a continuous chirp signal. — 2023. — https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2688438

18. Rolland L. M., Lognonné P., Astafyeva E., et al. The resonant response of the ionosphere imaged after the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake // Earth, Planets and Space. — 2011. — Vol. 63, no. 7. — P. 853–857. — https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2011.06.020

19. Sorokin A. G., Dobrynin V. A., Oynats A. V., et al. On the effect of the Rayleigh seismic wave in the atmosphere from the earthquake in Taiwan on April 3, 2024 // Collection of Proceedings of the XXXVII session of the Russian Acoustic Society. — Moscow : GEOS, 2025. — P. 84–90. — https://doi.org/10.34756/GEOS.2025.17.39225 — (In Russian).

20. Tsugawa T., Saito A., Otsuka Y., et al. Ionospheric disturbances detected by GPS total electron content observation after the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake // Earth, Planets and Space. — 2011. — Vol. 63, no. 7. — P. 875–879. — https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2011.06.035

21. Yusupov K. M., Mathews J. D., Maruyama T., et al. Amplitude variations of the reflected signal during vertical sounding of the ionosphere at middle latitudes // Solar-Terrestrial Physics. — 2020. — Vol. 6, no. 3. — P. 72–80. — https://doi.org/10.12737/stp-63202010